Warning!

Discussion in 'GR Classic Archive' started by RaZor^Devine, Jul 18, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. RaZor^Devine

    RaZor^Devine Active Member

    Posts:
    33
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2006
    Sry i dont no if this is the right place or not but any how i thought u guys/gals should no.

    There is some one on the Planetrenders.net site called Unkie who comes on these forums and takes ppls renders and posts them on planetrenders.net as his own work.

    I dunno if anyone no's this person or actually is this person but i thought u should all no so that u can make ure renders rip free or something.

    Any way that all

    Thx
     
  2. Forge

    Forge Well-Known Member

    Age:
    36
    Posts:
    444
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2007
    Ya, this is the wrong place for this, but im sure something will be done about this. I hate people who do that, ive seen it a lot before.
     
  3. Kalli

    Kalli Senior Member

    Age:
    38
    Posts:
    3,907
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2006
    Location:
    Missouri
    Unkie is a member on this site...he renders images himself. So I am sure he is using the renders he did himself.
     
  4. RaZor^Devine

    RaZor^Devine Active Member

    Posts:
    33
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2006
    Nop he isnt because hes posted a render of mine on planetrenders.net that i rendered not him.
     
  5. .difuzeD

    .difuzeD Well-Known Member

    Age:
    59
    Posts:
    600
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2007
    Location:
    Bronx, NY
    It was probably the same stock.

    Animate it to compare.
     
  6. charming

    charming Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    633
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2007
    its not what you know but what you can prove, unless you have proof matey id let it go =/
     
  7. Red Alert

    Red Alert Senior Member

    Posts:
    5,790
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2005
    wrong section and no proof
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page