Uk To Begin Withdrawing Iraq Troops

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by desertfox, Feb 20, 2007.

  1. desertfox

    desertfox Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    1,183
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2006
    LONDON, England (CNN) -- British Prime Minister Tony Blair will order nearly half the British troops in Iraq home by the end of 2007, British news outlets reported early Wednesday.

    The British Broadcasting Corporation and The Sun newspaper said Blair will tell the House of Commons on Wednesday that 1,500 soldiers will be back in Britain within weeks and that 3,000 of Britain's contingent of 7,000 will be back by the end of the year. (Watch how Blair told President Bush of the UK's plans Video)

    "Control of the south of the country, unaffected by the civil war raging around Baghdad, will be handed back to the Iraqis," the tabloid Sun reported.

    The move comes as the United States is sending more troops into Iraq in an effort to put down a wave of sectarian violence in Baghdad and pacify the western province of Anbar, the heart of the Sunni Arab insurgency.

    In Washington, National Security Council spokesman Gordon Johndroe said President Bush has been grateful for British support "in the past and into the future."

    "While the United Kingdom is maintaining a robust force in southern Iraq, we're pleased that conditions in Basra have improved sufficiently that they are able to transition more control to the Iraqis," Johndroe said in a statement issued Tuesday evening. "The United States shares the same goal of turning responsibility over to the Iraqi Security Forces and reducing the number of American troops in Iraq."

    In November, Defense Secretary Des Browne said Britain planned to bring several thousand troops home from Iraq by the end of 2007, but he gave no specific numbers. The remaining troops would be used to train Iraqi military and police forces, provide backup for Iraqi troops and protect supply lines for British, U.S. and allied troops who remained.

    But Blair said last month that an "arbitrary timetable" for withdrawal "would send the most disastrous signal to the people we are fighting in Iraq."

    Britain contributed about 46,000 soldiers, sailors and air force personnel to the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq in March 2003. More than half of those troops were withdrawn within two months of the invasion, and the remaining contingent, now numbering about 7,000, was based mostly in the southern city of Basra.

    The war has claimed more than 130 British lives and has never been popular with the British public. In January, as the United States announced plans to increase its contingent in Iraq by more than 20,000, British Foreign Secretary Margaret Beckett said London would not be following suit.

    Opposition to the war has hurt Blair politically, with his ruling Labor Party losing seats in Parliament and in local elections in the past two years. The prime minister announced in September that he would leave office within a year.

    Report of the withdrawal comes three days after reports that Prince Harry would deploy with his unit to Iraq in April or May. (Full story)

    His father, Prince Charles, was a pilot with the Royal Air Force and Royal Navy. Harry's grandfather, Prince Philip, had a distinguished career in the Royal Navy. Harry's uncle, Prince Andrew, was a Royal Navy pilot and served in the Falklands War against Argentina 25 years ago.


    Source: http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/meast/02/20/...oops/index.html
     
  2. .Apex

    .Apex Well-Known Member

    Age:
    33
    Posts:
    3,818
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    May 17, 2005
    Location:
    UK
    sweet, definetly bout time, specially as my bast mate is joining the army in 2008
     
  3. Bam

    Bam Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    744
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2007
    Finally. Hopefully the US follows.
     
  4. Meeza

    Meeza Junior Member

    Posts:
    13
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2007
    hmmmm I guess this is a good thing but the UK is taking a chance by taking out its forces first! guess to many people are complaining
     
  5. DeathWing980

    DeathWing980 New Member

    Posts:
    1
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2007
    About time something was done, you figure that after being there for what 4 years we would get the hint to pull out and just let them deal with what they got?

    i mean i have a few friends in my neighborhood who were sent to iraq and i was relieved when they came back unharmed but from watching the news and actually hearing about whats going on down there..

    i say we should just pull out and just hope for the best...
     
  6. PrivateJesus

    PrivateJesus Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    52
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2006
    man this is some good news, so many lives saved.

    since England had to be the leader, I hope US follows
     
  7. GuitarGuru

    GuitarGuru Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    1,250
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2006
    Location:
    Texas
    oh well, i just hope the US stays over there for quite a bit longer, and FYI for all of yall who think we're just going to pull out, yall are wrong. the war on terror will probably be going on for the rest of our lives (maybe just not in iraq)
     
  8. PrivateJesus

    PrivateJesus Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    52
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2006
    I agree that we shouldn't pull out now, but Iraq is in a civil war in which the people are going to have to decide for themselves in there, we shouldn't get in their problems.

    also, I agree, the war on terror will be a long a sad one.
     
  9. kirbir

    kirbir Senior Member

    Age:
    36
    Posts:
    17,226
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2005
    Location:
    England/Manchester
    The US are sending more troops in or so i heard on the news
     
  10. PrivateJesus

    PrivateJesus Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    52
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2006
    yes, sadly that is true that the US is sending in more troops. I don't agree with the decision making in our congress right now <_<
     
  11. ferret

    ferret Well-Known Member

    Age:
    33
    Posts:
    1,015
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2005
    Location:
    United States
    They need to step up the "Iraq-ification" thing; foriegn troops have been doing their job for far too long.
     
  12. DaVinci

    DaVinci Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    187
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2007
    yep..i agree with ferret....hopefully they WILL LEAVE..this time..lol:)
     
  13. Renwick.

    Renwick. Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    2,290
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2006
    Location:
    Sydney, Australia
    Man, these guys are complete idiots. Send them over for a year or two, then send half of them back?!?!?!?!
     
  14. DaVinci

    DaVinci Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    187
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2007
    year or two?...werent they there for longer....?
     
  15. Renwick.

    Renwick. Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    2,290
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2006
    Location:
    Sydney, Australia
    Sorry for that, I meant a few more years than I said.
     

Share This Page