Tutorial - Interrested?

Discussion in 'GR Classic Archive' started by icx, Dec 3, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. FM Lawlhalla

    FM Lawlhalla Senior Member

    Posts:
    8,061
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2005
    so if i would say i wont read it, i'm bad or something ?
    explain please.

    if people dont want to read a tutorial its their problem/decision its not something for you to decide ;)

    Some people dont even want to use tutorials.

    and to icx, just make the tutorial.
    why do you even bother making a topic about it?

    EDIT: oh and basically your not making much sense

    in your post you say :

    (--- probably meaning ------ wich is cencored.)

    those probably will be the ones who say that they wont read it.

    but a few words later you say that the people who dont read it, should have done.

    i think thats contradiction lolz.
     
  2. CarrieMarie30

    CarrieMarie30 Well-Known Member

    Age:
    50
    Posts:
    479
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2006
    Location:
    Mountain Home, ID
    Sigh, ok, since you want to start flaming. Basically I meant, those who need to express they wouldn't read it, should not even post there. I just feel that's unnecessary and rude. There's a ton of other people who would read it, and this person stating this, discourages the creator.

    For some reason, P.r.o. was censored. I have no idea why. My point I was trying to make, is the fact someone is willing to come into this thread, and state they won't read it, yet they looked into the topic anyway. Which tells me, they're looking for tutorials.

    Obviously you're trying to make me out to be a bad person. Which is fine, I'm used to your type. Stop reading between the lines Nubcake. I rather encourage my fellow artists than bring them down. Which is something a lot of you don't understand. It'll come when you grow up a bit though. Don't worry.
     
  3. FM Lawlhalla

    FM Lawlhalla Senior Member

    Posts:
    8,061
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2005
    no man not flaming, :)
    and i dont want you to feel bad about it ok. i didn't think i'd hurt you with saying that you just didn't made much sense in a post and that you contradicted yourself.

    And about the ------ word, i just said that it was cencored, had nothing negative to do with you o_O
    its just cencored here on the board because of the ratings, i dont know why they do it.
    But that can't be helped.

    im up for a flame war anytime if you want to though. ;)
    but lets do that over pm or msn or something.

    ofcourse there are many peope who would read it, everybody knows that.
    so why does he bother posting IF he should make it.
    why not ? theres always attention to tutorials.

    you know how it goes on GR.
    tutorials are sold nowadays, People only come into this thread to see if its a tutorial they get just to resell them.

    then why bother LOL.
    you say its fine,
    and you say your used : "my type" anyway.

    it goes a bit of a 2 way.
    you see me posting a lot helping people out to.
    and well you just dont "find" a style with tutorials imo.
    you find a style when your trying stuff out in photoshop on your own.
    and thats what i think a lot of people should do here on GR.
    stop buying and selling all those tutorials.
    make everything like that free again, and massively go photoshopping for your own needs/will to get better, and have fun.
    not being economical on a gfx forum. save that for companys.
    but now im fading from the topic so il quit here.

    and if i would be flaming i would've posted something entirely different.

    Well probably i'll grow up like all the cool kids with horny needs of putting models in one's signature. :rolleyes: ,
    and that probably was some minor flaming.
    I apologise in advance.




    EDIT: oh and sorry ICX for hyjacking your thread.
     
  4. K-74FF

    K-74FF Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    424
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2006
    FTW
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page