In that write up in the first post his lawyer said he had "redeemed" himself. Im sorry, but am I wrong in thinking that there is no possible way of redeeming yourself after murdering four people and co-founding a gang that has most definately killed more people? There is no redemption for murder, that entire statement is wrong. He got what was coming to him. Just because he has written books encouraging children not to join gangs, etc doesnt erase the past. He still killed those 4, and he recieved the appropriate punishment for it.
Personally I am one to believe that if you murder someone, you know that you will face charges. He should not have killed anyone. He killed a whole family. There are killers out there who will only kill one person and will die. What's to say this is any different. If you don't want to go through the death penalty which your state goes by, then do not murder another person. End of story. He was convicted, whether right or wrong, it's done. Life goes on. That's all. Game over. Finished.
I have the ability to kill people (everyone does ), but I choose not to use that ability. Therefore, I am saving lives.
A man gets MURDERED for a crime he 'could have' commited almost 27 years ago?!?! Come on... The American justice system is one, big fat JOKE... He has been in jail for almost 27 years, for what?? To create jobs? Thats the main reasons why all american jails are full anyway... If he really commited 4 murders, he deserved a punsihment..... .............but not after 27 years!! :censored: :censored:
i dunno this is almost controversial, i think he really shouldnt be executed, he was accused of the murders, nothing was proved
Well since i dont know this event so well (it was way back in 1979) i can only say may the Lord give him another chance in heaven or in hell.
I'ts to late he was executed Yesterday (Aus time), even know he should not have been executed, he actually done lots of good he wrote a series of children's books about why they should not be in Gangs and eventuall won the nobel peace prize award, just watch the movie "Redemption" starring "Jamie Foxx" it explains everything. Thereshould be no Death Penalty anyways i mean Life in Jail is bad enough you dont need to kill people, they probably just do it to make space for more inmates i mean the crime rate at the moment is pretty high in some cases, i dont understand after 27 years why they would execute him?why didnt they just execute him after his conviction, not wait 27 years and then kill the poor man, I mean what real proof do they have that states he killed the family of 4? i mean comeon 27 Years why didnt they just kill him straight away not wasting 27 years of his life. seems like Arnold Schwratzeneger(However the hell you spell it) screwed up. Thanks, Disturbed
well, if he killed em he deserved to die, the gang he founded is HUGE with divisions all over the states, he started an amazingly large amount of crime, i dont care how many books u write (to try and make yourself look like the good guy) your still the same person that founded a gang, lord knows how many people he killed or directly ordered others to kill. they killed a low-life thug, you people should be thanking them rather then saying "o arnolds gay" "its all his fault" one last thing, hes dead nothing can be done about it let it go
Yea but he also tried to stop the Crips and Bloodz he managed to stop a few but it seems the rest didnt listen :/
