The Watchman

Discussion in 'Signatures' started by .:Sir:., Nov 10, 2007.

  1. Nov 10, 2007 at 3:19 PM #1
    .:Sir:.

    .:Sir:. Active Member

    Posts:
    31
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2007
    v1 [​IMG]

    v2 [​IMG]
     
  2. Nov 10, 2007 at 3:27 PM #2
    nolonger

    nolonger Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    204
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2007
    Location:
    Look Up
    I think the sig is kind of confusing because of the many focus points. I like V2 better.
     
  3. Nov 10, 2007 at 3:37 PM #3
    .:Sir:.

    .:Sir:. Active Member

    Posts:
    31
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2007
    Added depth. Deleted other tags.
     
  4. Nov 10, 2007 at 11:20 PM #4
    .:Sir:.

    .:Sir:. Active Member

    Posts:
    31
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2007
    I never get any comments :*(
     
  5. Nov 10, 2007 at 11:38 PM #5
    Xioushi

    Xioushi Well-Known Member

    Age:
    35
    Posts:
    1,344
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2005
    Location:
    Ontario, Canada
    V2 is better, very low quality render as well imo.
     
  6. Nov 11, 2007 at 12:24 AM #6
    CarpeDiem

    CarpeDiem Well-Known Member

    Age:
    36
    Posts:
    642
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2007
    If v1 didn't have that text then I'd pick it. I like the depth and funkiness. Other than that, it's a bit sharp in some spots, possibly increase your dpi before starting or blur the too sharp parts. Broski, I don't care if the focal's not extremely obvious, because it's a cool sig.
     

Share This Page