360 for sure in 2008, in terms of games at least Gears 2 Fable 2 Too Human Halo Wars (I'm not sure about this one, and it will probably slip to '09) Ninja Gaiden 2 Fallout 3 50 Cent: Blood on the Sand (haha jk) Alan Wake
and out of all the ninja games i feel Tenchu Z could have been better you know wat would have been cool if you could make your character any race
bottom line is... the Wii is the most interactive and fun console you can purchase. But if you're looking at it from a performance and sophisticated gaming level, I think the PS3 has the 360 beat. Yes, Xbox has more games as everyone keeps repeating. But you have to look at it above current game titles released, because lets face it, as much as I like Xbox Live; the games developed on the 360 only has to be written on your standard DVD... whereas PS3 needs to be written on Bluray. Once game developers learn to use Bluray and PS3's dominate Cell processors to it's full potential PS3 will blow 360 away... you could probably count on microsoft making a bluray drive for their 360s lol. PS3 put more thought into their next-gen console than Microsoft, simple as that. And for the record, I've had a 360 since they came on the market so I'm not favoring the PS3. I also like PS3's online content more than Xbox Live because of the simple fact that I DON'T HAVE TO PAY FOR IT. Alright but enough of that I'm going to play on my 360.... oh wait, I can't... I forgot i had the 3 red rings of death =)
I don't know. In all honesty I haven't bought one yet, and I'm not on a rush to get one. They all have their benefits and I've considered them all. Wii has the price advantage and the fun advantage - It's a lot more fun and it can increase fitness on your wii. 360 has the game advantage, but in all honesty so many people I know have had to send their 360's off because they've broken I don't think it's worth it. PS3, well one I like blu-ray movies (owning a vaio laptop I can play them already) and it's got the potential if developers use it. In all honesty if I had a choice looking back at everything I really would buy a Wii now. 360 people seem to be sending it off more than they actually play it, PS3 blu-rays nice, but I can feed the laptop through the TV for blu-ray. Wii's fun, sure it's not the best but it's just so much fun. And thats why these consoles exist. Ergo Wii>PS3>360
Well I think that we all know how PS3 has won all the titles and everything. Its just not beatable anymore, we know the majority of people around world are dieing to have a PS3 or either have one already and they are so much happy about it. PS3 is the ultimate hype of today's gaming and the future schemes they have are surely to have your minds thinking.
How on earth has PS3 won? Lets see, is it winning in sales? No. Revenue from games? No. Reviews of services, past and present? No. Hardware quality? It may be edging above 360 right now but give it time...this is Sony after all. Does it make the most profit? No. So how can it possibly be winning? Oh, and show me one person whose truly over the moon about the future of PS3 and its "innovations to come" and I'll show you ten thinking the same thing about Wii. Don't get me wrong, Sony have a nice little console with good prospects. But the 360 is still selling well, it's library is still expanding and it still claims a larger fan base than PS3 and then the Wii is selling even better and set to continue well into the next six months, with the fastest expanding library of any of them and though it may not be able to match the sheer power of the others its proving to be by far the most popular. Plus, PC pwns them all.
I think the fact that HD-DVD is now a dead format would give the PS3 a major advantage, but I still don't think that it's "winning", nor do I think there ever will be a "winner".( See: Ps2 vs Xbox ) Trying to find a winner is a really stupid thing to do. Declaring one is the stupidest.
Okay, I am not talking about PC. I don't have a PS3, yet I was in favor of the PS3 because of what it has delivered in the past, PS2 had actually bet the Xbox. Now what I don't understand is why everyone declares PS3 the winner where there is a debate between the PS3 and 60. Apparently, my brother has told me the difference between the two and I believe that 60 is really the heat, it has a lot of games on it. You have several 'exclusive' features with you do not get on the PS3. But I am still to find out what the experts say about the two, I think Gamespot has officially declared 60 over PS3, is it true?
