*o0Reclaimer0o* Everything is cool except that I don't like texts that is over that much of the pic. 9/10 Btw, I change my text on my 2nd sig. So compare which is better? --The old one--- ---- @lucky Kevin: Well, I recommand change the mode of the text to "Soft light". Then go on to "Layer Blending>Drop Shadow" and applied those setting: Mode: Normal Opacity: 100% Angel: 0 Distance: 3 Spread: 0 Size: 3 afterwards, duplicate the text and change the copy opacity to "46" That should make ur text match ur bg.
7/10 The background is good but as others said the text is over a lot of stuff, but other than that it's good
TheProphet: Thanks. I wanted the quote in there, so I expected that. I love the Pixel Stretch/Grunge sigs. I plan to make myself one... 8/10.
*Hellknight* Me, myself is not really into TOO much color in a single sig, I believe it would ruin the sig but yours looks pretty nice. 8/10
hmmmmm first sig 7.5/10 everything is sexy, i just dont like the render (over-whored) cant say much about the second sig cos its photomanipulated and i dont know what the original photo looked like and what you added to it other than the text and a brightness/contrast layer above everything
I like it. well blended, like the colors too. a bit too bright in some parts? and perhaps too long, resulting in quite a bit of excessive spaces. 7.8/10
well the first sig isn't really the kind of style i would normally go for but it is a well made sig... 7/10. the 2nd sig is very nice i like the photo manip u did to it, thats the better of the 2 imo.8.5/10
7.5/10 on your first 8.5/10 on the second both looks same but 2nd one is more nicer as the first render sticks out a bit IMHO very nice sigs i say