Rate The Sig Above You ..

Discussion in 'Graphics discussion' started by TheGrudge214, Jan 5, 2002.

  1. turkishgold11

    turkishgold11 Well-Known Member

    Age:
    39
    Posts:
    491
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2005
    Location:
    I dunno, do you?
    nice sigs, text could be better on both of then however.

    Lighting effects are fantastic.

    8.9 for the first
    9.2 for the second
     
  2. Rallypacker2

    Rallypacker2 Guest

    Pretty cool, nice swirl effect but the colors don't match so well. 7/10.
     
  3. sillychicken

    sillychicken Well-Known Member

    Age:
    33
    Posts:
    553
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2005
    8/10 love that smudgey/defaults look
     
  4. EBK

    EBK Senior Member

    Posts:
    4,720
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2005
    Location:
    Sac,CA
    7/10 for both..nice clean style..
     
  5. .scurenzio

    .scurenzio Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    3,585
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2004
    Location:
    The Netherlands.
    7/10

    and

    6/10

    I think you need to rethik the placement and effects on the text in sig #2 ^_^.
     
  6. ashums

    ashums Well-Known Member

    Age:
    35
    Posts:
    323
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2006
    Location:
    houston, texas
    messy .. 4/10 text is horrible...keep trying ^^
     
  7. markers

    markers Well-Known Member

    Age:
    36
    Posts:
    492
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2005
    Location:
    Houston, TX
    8/10 - ewwww @ lighting
     
  8. (D)ark(H)eart(Paradox

    (D)ark(H)eart(Paradox Member

    Posts:
    9
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2006
    8/10 don't like text
     
  9. EBK

    EBK Senior Member

    Posts:
    4,720
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2005
    Location:
    Sac,CA
    5.5/10 on both..looks nice but more things could be done to improve it...
     
  10. AngelX

    AngelX Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    548
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2005
    Top- B- It's alright. Add more depth

    Bottom- B- Lines are a little akward. Splatters don't match the render
     
  11. CeAt

    CeAt Well-Known Member

    Age:
    34
    Posts:
    830
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2005
    Location:
    Dallas, Texas
    6/10
    4/10

    Sorry man, not very good
     
  12. /mercury

    /mercury Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    848
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2006
    The first one is cool 8/10

    the second I can't understand if it's just an image that you took out from a site, or you made the bg, and took the renders out of something. Anyways, I don't like it 6/10
     
  13. AG Triumph

    AG Triumph Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    2,623
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2005
    Location:
    lost-exile.deviantart.com/
    1st
    not liking the colors or the bg, text goes well but needs depth
    5.5/10
    2nd
    bg is nice but i dont like colors or lighting, again needs depth 6/10
     
  14. sdf91

    sdf91 Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    73
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    8/10 for both good blending on the first and i like the second bg
     
  15. Λtreyu

    Λtreyu Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    1,505
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2005
    its ok, the tech doesn't match though.
     

Share This Page