PT Submission #37

Discussion in 'GR Classic Archive' started by Master, Dec 23, 2005.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Master

    Master Senior Member

    Age:
    38
    Posts:
    6,560
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2005
    Location:
    Florida
  2. Master

    Master Senior Member

    Age:
    38
    Posts:
    6,560
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2005
    Location:
    Florida
    I dont like it. He doesnt go into detail, at all. Doesnt explain anything. He doesnt show the C4D render (which he misspelled "CD4" btw), he doesnt show the guy render. He pretty much tells you what to do and you guess the rest of it. I dont think the smudging was good.. And I dident learn too much from tut. Final result was decent, but text sucked. Tut could've looked better in general.

    No.
     
  3. Rufio

    Rufio Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    5,220
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2005
    I agree with master. If he put more work and detail into it, I would have said yes, but he didn't. The outcome looks good though, but my vote is still no
     
  4. Faith.09

    Faith.09 Banned from GR

    Age:
    19
    Posts:
    4,849
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2004
    Location:
    http://faith-09.deviantart.com
    what master said.

    the outcome is poor imo too.
     
  5. LXSCOPE

    LXSCOPE Senior Member

    Age:
    35
    Posts:
    1,665
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2005
    Location:
    Chicago
    Same reasons as above, i really dont like the outcome and he isnt much descriptive in my opinion.

    No.
     
  6. Ethereal.07

    Ethereal.07 Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    734
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2005
    meh i agree with u all but its unique style O_O;
    my vote is No
     
  7. Master

    Master Senior Member

    Age:
    38
    Posts:
    6,560
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2005
    Location:
    Florida
    Final Vote: No
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page