Pt Submission #14

http://www.gamerenders.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=142730

 

I have to go with the No.

The outcome isnt any good at all.

 

i vote yes.
its very well explained.
and perfect for people that want to start with c4d, without knowing anything yet.
i didnt saw spelling errors.
and yes i have to agree the result is pretty ugly.
but try finding such a detailed tutorial, with a good outcome.
its more about getting the early facts. and build arround that.

 

Unfortunately, I don't have the program he was using for this tutorial so I coudn't go along with it. I read through the entire tut anyway and even though I don't have the program it still seemed very easy to follow. The tutorial is very well written and also extremely detailed. I love the way it was presented, the way he faded the images and lightened the buttons or settings. The end result may not be the greatest but I don't think any tutorial is meant to be followed exactly, everyone should come up with a different end result.

I am going to vote yes on this one.

 

We, as GameRenders dont have many C4D tutorial writers, or C4D tuts at all for that matter. As Fubar said, I love how he presented the tutorial. There are a few gramatical mistakes, but nothing too easy to catch. Contractions seem fine, good colors, plenty images, etc. Again, the outcome is bad, and once again, just as Fubar said, tutorials arent meant to be coppied exactly the same 110%.

My vote is a Yes.

 

so we have 3 yes's but only 2 votes for yes .
who forgot to vote lol.

 

I have to go with master on this one, the amount of c4d tutorials are limited and this one is in such great detail.

I dont have c4d but the descriptiveness and the amount of pictures etc. is great. I like it. Outcome isnt great but im sure it will teach the user more about different c4d techniques and what not.

 

I vote no, the outcome is not premium quality. I have seen many different c4d tag tutorals that are just as well explained and have better results.

 

Crapit!!! I accidently null voted but I would have voted no.

 

YOU FLIPPING IDIOT. GO TO HELL.. WHY ARE YOU TRYEN TO RUIN EVERYTHING? DAMNIT BILLY DIE.


3-4

 

I vote no, the outcome isnt very good, and to be quite blunt, people arent going to like it as much, or want to actually follow the tut if they dont even like the outcome.

No

3-5

 

I vote Yes, The results are not that great however its very well explained and very good for the starters

 

You forgot to vote.

 

I voted No. It wasn't really teaching you about lighting but on how to make the end result. He could've stopped half way and it would've been a fairly nice tut on lighting but it just went on and messed up even more. You don't really need all that to teach you about lighting and using sphere's like that wasn't really good since it was mainly focused on the outcome. For that length and steps, it would've been better to make an abstract render and throw in some deformers to make it more kickass.

 

Currently 3-6.

One more "No" vote will Decline this tutorial.