Thats a definite yes from me. I love the outcome and it is very descriptive and helpful. I like it a lot, i just skimmed through most of it and will use it right now. I'll tell ya what i think after that but this is a yes. Its great to learn some cool effects like that.
Definatly a No for me. The sig outcome is novice, its not written professionaly, theres no pollish, just white text and a few images, and its too much reading for an effect like that. Yes, the effect is good, but that is more of a full sig tut; and I have definatly seen better. Btw, LXSCOPE, just a reminder, its not only about how the tut is written. Its also about how good it actually is, in other words we dont want novice sigs.
Master said it all. The outcome is bad IMO. I guess the tutorial itself is well written, but the outcome. no. im 50/50. Im not going to vote just yet.
The tutorial itself is written well, although I find that when people use a big font like he did they are trying to portray that they have written a lot when really they didn't. If he used a smaller text the tutorial would have been a lot smaller. The whole tutorial includes: Brushing 2 Color Adjustment Layers 2 Blending Layers 1 Brightness and Contrast Layer End Result. If you put it in those terms it really doesn't seem premium. So my vote would really have to be no. BTW, I am really just voting on the fire-effect part because that's what he called his tut.
