Hm...this is a hard choice. Eccentric, I love the brushing around the render and the placement of the render...but I think it's a bit too bland everywhere else. Sock, yours seems like it's the render doing all the work. I can't really tell what you did to it except for some blending. And the text is kinda just...there. Not really helping the sig as a whole. Overall, I like Sock's better.
Here's the thing, eccentric. I can tell you put some work into your sig and the stock placement is just dandy. But, unfortunatly, the expanse of the sig can be taken in and evaluated in under a second and there isn't all that much composition to speak of. Put bluntly, it's boring. Sock's, does not disprove that the same amount of work and thought was put into it, and it holds my attention better. So, I'm voting Sock.
Sock gmv even though c4d is dominating his sig, i just dont like how the render in the other one looks like.
i go with eccentric. sock's is abstract... a lil too abstract. i like how eccentric blened his sig and did not use c4d B) .
