Alright, I would have to go with MT on this one. His is more visually appealling. Irrel's looks like it took way more effort but its not as appealing. Good work both of ya, keep it up and you will go far. 1-1
Considering I've never used any of those brushes before.... [/b][/quote] good job on not understanding my comment, if your view was the case, i would have said "brushes", not "brushing" - and if you don't understand now, i won't bother, ggs
good job on not understanding my comment, if your view was the case, i would have said "brushes", not "brushing" - and if you don't understand now, i won't bother, ggs [/b][/quote] Different technique as well. If you're saying it looks similar to my other stuff, it probably does. I'd rather not whore a style everyone else does, when I can whore my own.
Brilliant reason.... 5-2 The effort gone into it to create something so, technical, and detailed is just huge and its got a nicer look overall
though voting, but I go for Irrel, it was tough. I mean MT has a better overall look. but the originality and effects put in the Irrels on really pwn. 6-2
irrelevant i loved bot of the,m, but irrel's was cleaner and was just the type of stuff i would put as a desktop wallpaper (not that it is the case, but it is a reason) mt's was a bit way ofverbrushed 7-2 gg guys. as someone said u will go far
