Next Middle Eastern War?

Discussion in 'GR Classic Archive' started by SomeThingCreepy, Jul 12, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. william123

    william123 Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    199
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2006
    :(
     
  2. ferret

    ferret Well-Known Member

    Age:
    38
    Posts:
    1,015
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2005
    Location:
    United States
    Of course they were in a disputed area :rolleyes: . Where'd you hear that? Al-Jazeera?

    ----, even Hezbollah says that they crossed the border.

    Where's Zarit? Let's find out, shall we?

    [​IMG]

    That bold red line is the border. An internationally-recognized border. An internationally-recognized border between Lebanon and Israel. By the way, the "disputed territory" you speak of is to the south-east. You say you "live in the middle-east," yet you don't know simple geography?

    All the drugs in the world couldn't make someone act as stupid as you're acting right now.
     
  3. Machiavelli X

    Machiavelli X Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    1,167
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2006
    A international recongized border? That is completely BS, I dont care about the international community and neither does Isreali, they have broken almost ever international law against prisonsers and attacks but does the world ever speak up? NO! The Un tried to pass a resolution calling for a cease-fre but the US Vetoed it! How can 1 Nation Veto a INTERNATIONAL resolution, dont you see the propblem with that? As long as the hyprocictic US goverment protects isreal they can do what ever they want with out any consquenqes, dont you see the propblem with this? The UN is run by the americans so anything they say is completely BS and should not be followed, there soliders dont even know how to fight, evry time they go into a area they seem to mess it up or not do anything, look at somilia the UN didnt do naything to protect the people lol.
     
  4. ferret

    ferret Well-Known Member

    Age:
    38
    Posts:
    1,015
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2005
    Location:
    United States
    Blame your international community for giving an internationally-recognized body the power to give people veto power. Trust me, China and Russia both would've vetoed anything against North Korea that involved military action, and that's against a nation threatening to nuke a few people. The Israeli-Lebanon border is not in dispute, idiot. Gaza, the West Bank, and the Golan Heights are the only disputed areas. And the US didn't veto because it's just trying to cover Israel's ass, it vetoed because it didn't agree with the US foriegn policy. Same reason the UK, France, Russia, and China can veto anything they want. The wording basically gave Hezbollah immunity for any actions they take while condemning Israel. Read up on it a bit.

    The UN troops aren't there to fight, they're there to protect people. They're called peacekeepers, dip----. They can't fire on anyone unless they're fired upon. They've got their hands tied in everything they do. It's not the troops' fault that Somalis died, it's the policies they have to follow that got Somalis killed.

    The UN isn't "run by the US." The US can't push its policies simply because they're shot down because they're American. It's not run by anybody, dip----. When will you come out of your little shell?

    Also, contrary to popular belief, the Israelis follow the Laws of Armed Conflict (LOAC). Hezbollah doesn't. I have yet to see your proof that Israelis are commiting war crimes and massacring people so I'm going to take that as you being mad because you got your ass handed to you.

    Israelis can't get away with stuff like that. There'd be outcry from all of Europe and the US, to save face, would withdraw its support for Israel. Hell, Europe bitches at every breath the Israelis take and they're not reporting that Israelis are killing off people by the thousands. It's not happening, face it.

    Also, the Israelis aren't signatories of the Geneva convention which defines treatement for POWs. Those are prisoners of war. There are no laws governing treatment of terrorists. Israelis aren't violating their human rights, so as far as the international community is concerned, let them do whatever. They're not binded by anything other than the LOAC. They're not "breaking the rules" because they aren't binded by those rules.

    If these terrorists want Geneva convention rights, they want to be lined up against a wall and shot as spies. They're fighting in civilian clothes with no identification as partisans. The Geneva convention says execute them upon capture. Is that what you want?
     
  5. [$$]~PIMP

    [$$]~PIMP Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    485
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    May 14, 2005
    Location:
    MiaMI,UsA
    i dont c why we cant just bomb the F*ckers
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page