New Photoshop Logo

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by Northern., Jan 22, 2009.

  1. Northern.

    Northern. Well-Known Member

    Age:
    34
    Posts:
    628
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2007
    Location:
    England, Cumbria
  2. Greasy Pete

    Greasy Pete Senior Member

    Age:
    32
    Posts:
    9,314
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    May 15, 2005
    Location:
    Massachusetts
    i think that's only for Adobe Pho­to­shop Online
     
  3. Pulse.

    Pulse. Well-Known Member

    Age:
    38
    Posts:
    5,359
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2005
    Location:
    Reading, UK
    i like it but the feathers are better
     
  4. AeroSwift

    AeroSwift Member

    Posts:
    19
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2009
    I kind of like it, but I'm missing the 'S'. =(
     
  5. Kurog

    Kurog Well-Known Member

    Age:
    32
    Posts:
    462
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2006
    ughhh I don't like it
     
  6. Jynx_

    Jynx_ Banned from GR

    Age:
    31
    Posts:
    177
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2006
    Location:
    Ireland.
    It's terrible.
    It's the most cliched logo ever.
    I still think the CS1 logo was the best.
     
  7. Justin`

    Justin` Senior Member

    Age:
    31
    Posts:
    1,230
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2006
    Location:
    New Hampshire
    I like CS3/4 the best, extremely simple and to the point.
     
  8. Rensen18

    Rensen18 Well-Known Member

    Age:
    34
    Posts:
    208
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2005
    Location:
    Canada
    It's nice, it's just not for ps though. =\
     
  9. .//XeN-

    .//XeN- Well-Known Member

    Age:
    33
    Posts:
    1,387
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2005
    Personally I think it's horrible, but it's also quite old, adobe revealed this ages ago.

    Still, the feather was the best.
     
  10. Greasy Pete

    Greasy Pete Senior Member

    Age:
    32
    Posts:
    9,314
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    May 15, 2005
    Location:
    Massachusetts

    i agree
     
  11. }SoC{SainT

    }SoC{SainT Well-Known Member

    Age:
    34
    Posts:
    1,328
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    May 29, 2005
    Location:
    Oregon
    You guys go make a logo for a client. I don't just mean make a logo. I mean make one for a client.

    I don't think logos should change unless identities change. I don't even know why they paid to have it made. Either way, I'm indifferent. A logo's a logo. I don't believe that's used in the actual program anyway. I have CS4 and I see the blue box with Ps everywhere I go, even the about box.

    Didn't we have a topic on this before?
     
  12. EBK

    EBK Senior Member

    Posts:
    4,720
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2005
    Location:
    Sac,CA
    looks simple and koo to me.
     
  13. nanSTA

    nanSTA Senior Member

    Posts:
    4,295
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2006
    Location:
    Chicago, IL
    Dont mind it. I do like the feather though, If they did the same to the feather. Would be cool.
     
  14. Neuron

    Neuron Senior Member

    Age:
    32
    Posts:
    2,505
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2007
    Location:
    US
    I think you're all mad that you can't do better.
     
  15. Broken

    Broken Well-Known Member

    Age:
    33
    Posts:
    5,197
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2005
    Location:
    Oof?
    The feather's aren't a logo, per se, since they change on every different version of Photoshop and the various Adobe products, it's a common theme but not a common identity. I suspect the logo posted is not going to replace the feather or the boxes the photoshop programs currently sit in, it's more a global photoshop logo to link them all together, and probaly will only be hidden in a corner somewhere.

    PS : People who start mentioning, "you try doing a logo". How the ------ is that relevant? simply because people can't do something themselves doesn't restrict their right to comment/criticise a huge companies logo. If it did, there'd be no criticism...of anything.
     

Share This Page