My Sig(s)

Discussion in 'GR Classic Archive' started by chrislee149, Jan 8, 2005.

  1. chrislee149

    chrislee149 Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    159
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2005
    Just done today and yesterday.
    [​IMG]
    With matching avatar!
    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    -deleted because I didn't really want that in there-
     
  2. chrislee149

    chrislee149 Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    159
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2005
    [​IMG]
    New; someone please rate/comment.
     
  3. EA Genesis

    EA Genesis Senior Member

    Posts:
    3,677
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2004
    Location:
    I am where I am
    1. 9.5/10
    2. 8.5/10
    3. 7/10
    4. 7.5/10
    5. 3.3/10
    6. 8.1/10
     
  4. Cycloon

    Cycloon Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    420
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2004
    lol 3.3 :P
     
  5. Generation

    Generation Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    1,256
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2004
    all 2.5...:P
     
  6. Cycloon

    Cycloon Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    420
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2004
    lol, who can say a lower number ? :lol:
     
  7. ColdCanadian

    ColdCanadian Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    277
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2004
    1.9/10 good tech sig i like it...but some empty space

    2. 7/10 too much empty space but nice text and render...

    3. 6/10 just because

    4. 4/10 animation sucks, and lost of empty space and too much text...

    5. 2/10 looks like you just slapped a picture beneath some text...

    edit: new one. 1/10 why...why did you put the text in front of the render? and background isn't good too much empty space
     
  8. Kirkus

    Kirkus Well-Known Member

    Age:
    36
    Posts:
    50
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2004
    all 4.5,except number 6, that one gets a 6
     
  9. chrislee149

    chrislee149 Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    159
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2005
    The text just seemed to look better in front of the render. Here's the text moved to the right corner:
    [​IMG]
     
  10. GreenGun

    GreenGun Active Member

    Posts:
    39
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2004
    Nice job man! ;)
     
  11. ColdCanadian

    ColdCanadian Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    277
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2004
    i like that much better good job


    that'll raise it to like an 8/10, render still needs to blennnnd

    what font is the chrislee man that's pretty cool
     
  12. chrislee149

    chrislee149 Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    159
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2005
    I attempted to get better at grunge...
    [​IMG]
     
  13. Phat Albert

    Phat Albert Well-Known Member

    Age:
    37
    Posts:
    3,829
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2004
    First one is the only good one.
     
  14. Fazen

    Fazen Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    349
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2005
    Hey Chris: This is Fade from AQ..

    Your grunge attempt is okay.. But if you are going to use a render.. You definitely need to blend it. Background isn't well, clear enough.. But I guess that could be called soft grunge..
     
  15. chrislee149

    chrislee149 Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    159
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2005
    It actually is blended quite a bit, but not as much as the usual grunge sig render would. It started as a grunge, but kind of transformed. It was basically just an experimentation with my new brushes.
     

Share This Page