Members Moderating Via The Rep System

Discussion in 'GR Classic Archive' started by Lord_D, Aug 26, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Page 2 of 2
  1. Aug 26, 2006 at 2:37 PM #16
    Biggy

    Biggy Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    406
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2005
    I don't think everyone should neg rep someone for breaking the rules. I mean the mods will deal with it. They do not need 4 neg reps telling them they were wrong. It is like being punished 4 times by four different people..
     
  2. Aug 26, 2006 at 3:16 PM #17
    ZeT0

    ZeT0 Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    1,545
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2005
    yeah i dont think people should -rep after a mod has taken care of it. but if you -rep before then its alright.
     
  3. Aug 26, 2006 at 3:50 PM #18
    Greasy Pete

    Greasy Pete Senior Member

    Age:
    34
    Posts:
    9,314
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    May 15, 2005
    Location:
    Massachusetts
    there not really `moderating` as your topic title says...
     
  4. Aug 26, 2006 at 4:29 PM #19
    .bOdY

    .bOdY Well-Known Member

    Age:
    37
    Posts:
    861
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    May 24, 2006
    its just a rep.who cares
     
  5. Aug 26, 2006 at 5:41 PM #20
    Veripare

    Veripare Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    248
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2006
    It's wrong to backseat mod, so no.
     
  6. Aug 27, 2006 at 1:11 AM #21
    Scooby.05

    Scooby.05 Senior Member

    Age:
    40
    Posts:
    6,350
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2005
    Location:
    Ohio
    This topic is absolutely pointless and belongs in Off-Topic anyway.

    People will use the rep system as they see fit. While you may disagree as to why they -repped you or something, they can also disagree as to what entitles a -rep. Everyone will have conflicting opinions on every matter, a poll from other members won't make them think otherwise. Closed.
     
Page 2 of 2
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page