Mario!

Discussion in 'Signatures' started by tk_nh1, Oct 26, 2009.

  1. tk_nh1

    tk_nh1 Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    185
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2009
    Ver 1.
    [​IMG]

    Ver 2.
    [​IMG]

    Which one?!?! CnC please :huh:
     
  2. ldratio

    ldratio Member

    Posts:
    100
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2009
    The render in my opinion, doesnt suit the style that you have gone for, the mario would fit more intro a vector sig. The colours also don't match very well. And is too full with effects and renders. Version 2 is alot better, as it drown's all the different colours, and makes it look that little bit less full.
     
  3. tk_nh1

    tk_nh1 Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    185
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2009
    Hm... never thought about that... Thanks ^^
     
  4. inverse

    inverse Banned from GR

    Age:
    31
    Posts:
    3,445
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Location:
    New Zealand
    All of your sigs are over-contrasted, oversharpened, poorly coloured, and with bad composition and text.

    I'd recommend you go back and do more tutorials, but you'd probably just get offended.
     
  5. EFX

    EFX Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    3,842
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2005
    Like mentioned before, version two is better. In the first version, there's too much contrasting colors going on and it looks a bit too busy.

    I also agree with Idratio in that the render doesn't really fit with the sig style.
     

Share This Page