Now seriously.. is there a post of yours in this topic NOT including swearing and fanboyremarks. "...you idiot" "----ing fanboys" "6 year old..." And although you always have these remarks about so-called fanboys you always defend xbox in the end, hereby proving my statement in my previous post. It almost seems as if you are actually angry at Sony for being sooner... wow. He didn't say that Playstation was better or anything, he just said there were more sold playstations. Sony has sold allready well over 90 million Ps2 units. Microsoft over 20 million Xbox units. Did you expect another 2 years would make up that difference ? No. Simple as that. And guess what ? That fact has absolutely nothing to do with how good the console is, or with fanboys. Besides, Microsoft didn't have a fanbase, but they basicly instantly created one. Because a lot of people were like "I have microsoft on my computer, and it has actual computer parts so it has to be cool" It was better because it came quite some time after the Playstation, and xbox fans have always had the right to call the console of their choise the best in terms of hardware. However, now that Playstation turns out better, suddenly Sony sucks because Microsoft released their console sooner. Ps3 will be way too expensive and so on and so on. I don't care who buys what console. It just irritates me that Playstation is being bashed by a lot of xbox fans against all facts about the console. "You don't know it will own, it isn't even out yet" True, so you also cant say it won't own If we can't speculate it will be good because it isn't out yet, you also can't speculate it will suck.
You mis-read. No one is saying the Xbox will be better, I haven't said that once. EVERYONE is jumping to conclusions and saying the PS3 will be better. And I'm not the one who brought up the amount of PS2's sold, but since it was brought up I retaliated with a fact which explained it's heightened sales.
And you can tell this from looking at a couple of games...which havent been released yet. Your structuring all of this on a video...which might not even be real ingame footage. But anyways i'm not a fan boy if thats what your thinking, i just find it stupid that people judge things over a video which could be nothing like the end outcome.
Not that it matters to me, really, but I hate people saying ps3 and x360 have the same graphical capabilites... Because they have not. The ps3 supports higher resolution. And don't call me fanboy for this. I don't think the ps3 as a console will be that much more impressive than x360. And how do that look ûber-awesome? It's next-gen, we are seeing tons of that graphics. It's not like it's more beautiful than Project Offset, wich might come out for both ps3 and x360 in 2-3 years... Only reason I buy consoles is for the gameplay, though, so I'll go with ps3 (many games and some of my fav franchises) and possibly the rev (imagine FPS with that controller)
There is no way in hell that the XBox 360 and the PS3 will have the same graphics OKAY! There IS a reason for the price difference... It's amusing... the XBox fanboiiiis could always counter the argument that ps2 has more games BUT XBox is a better system... now that the PS3 will be a better system AND have better/more games it's like they've got a stick poked up their asses from jealousy... but man sure let's wait for it to come out and see... and if it does turn out more powerful then what????
The REASON for the price difference is because Sony can afford to do it, they have to do a lot less work then Microsoft because of PSone and the PSP etc. More people trust sony's consoles as they have been around far longer. The graphics are basically the same so instead of basing it on a VIDEO why not go check the actual specs. Plus, since when did PS3 have better games? YOu practically know NOTHING about the console except specs and your jumping to conclusions.
Dude you're a fanboii on the brink of crying... I can tell your "desperatism" that XBox has to be the best in everything... you know it's COMMON sense that the ps, ps2 always had the biggest library with the most variety and the highest sells/ratings blah blah.... you get the point... so then ALL OF A SUDDEN PS3 says "NO MORE GAMES"... NOOOOOO! Another smart thingy you said which made me chuckle... you said "more expensive" because they can afford to... that's kinda funny considering the fact when the XBox and Gamecube came out the Playstation 2 went down in price $200+ (Canadian)... to compete... you REALLY THINK they would sell a PS3 more expensive for the heck of it??? History sure doesn't say so... so obviously PS3 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> XBox360... it's ALMOST fact!
Just because its more expensive doesnt mean thats its gonna be better. All you have to go on is a little video that could have been pre-rendered and specs. And from that you are able to say that the PS3 is gonna be WHY CANT WE WAIT TILL IT COMES OUT! At this stage i couldnt care if the PS3 has better graphics or better games because it could all change. And all this talk about the PS3 having better games than the 360 is pointless as NOBODY here has played a PS3 and can tell us that without a doubt that the PS3 games are 100%! better than the xbox 360 games.
PS Games >>> Other Non-PC Consoles PS2 Games >>> Other Non-PC consoles I'm not looking at graphics or loading times here... gameplay/fun/replay value etc for example Fable the super famous RPG on XBox was like what? 12 hours? That's a SAD rpg and no replay value... that's what I'm talking about with better GAMING!
Fable was a great RPG with hours more of playing value, so the statement you just made is false. You could complete the main story line in around 15 hours but you can continue to explore the land and do missions which give the game alot more game time value.
PS2 had more games but the VERY large majority sucked, some were terribly babyish. Either way i'm out, this isn't going anywhere and we're just gonna have to wait for PS3 to come out
