Just wonder how you rate other people's sigs.. Do rate it good, if you like it? If its good some good effects? If it's simple, but good? How? Please gimme feedback!
Most of the time I rate things like use of the colors, how the render (if there is one) is blended. How good the render looks... But everynow and then if I just plain don't like it... I just tell 'em! :lol:
i first look at the colour and the render, if it matches then i look if its got a border, then i look at the quality of the brushing, and last and obviously least, i look at the text
Colors and Backrounds are most important for me, and how well the text fits with everything else in the sig.
i just rate it if i like it or not. flowing colors, good blending, good brushing, has a border, good text...
I try to refrain from rating, and just simply put a comment - since the words help them not really a number.
I'll tell them exactly what I dislike, and what I like. I give big points for being unique. (I don't like sigs that look the same as everyboy else's. Then I will give a rating.
Im a designer and a mod on a lot of sites, so when i look at a sig i look the difficulty of wat they made then i grade it. If they do something easy and still screw it up, then i rate it differently than someone doing somethin harder and doign nto so good. Usually i look on hwo the render works with the bg and the text and if i matches the bg well. I look at the overall complexion of the sig of thats clear enough for ya lol
colours, then background, if they fit i look at the render if it has one, if thats good, i look at a border, if it has none i move on, if it does have 1 i rate that as in the total look and feel of it corresponding to the sigs theme and colour, next i look at the text and if it blends well with the sig, then i look at the entire thing as in good and bad, see what can be improved, post wat can be, then i rate it dependin on how well all of those things put together
