Still reppin' the 8800GT here. I don't do a lot of gaming, and when I do, 45-60fps is absolutely adequate for me at 1920x1200 resolution. Unless you're using an LCD with some new age high refresh rate technology in it, you're not actually going to be able to get your screen to display more than 60fps anyway, so you're wasting your time expecting your PC to render at 100fps. Unless you're using a CRT, in which case take the money and buy a cheap LCD.
if all your games play fine no. and you should certainly do A LITTLE research before buying http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx...N82E16814121288 THAT, at $134 runs circles around an 8800 ultra... which by the way hasn't been made in years and if found would be overpriced.
It was overpriced to start with, just like the Top-Dog card has always been. You pay a 50% premium for that extra 10% performance.
WOW if that's the truth behind that Graphics Card then I'll definitely buy it (the Asus one you suggested) but since NewEgg doesn't ship to my country, do you have any other place that I can buy it from?
no clue and I exagerated it doesn't run circles but it certainely does do considerably better than it. AMD is basically winning right now 4770>9800GT/8800GT(the 9800GT is basically a rebranded 8800, they even had an incident where companies were caught switching stickers) 4850>8800GTX/8800ultra/9800GTX/GTS 250 4870 512mb ~= GTX 260 4870 1GB ~= GTX 260 216SP 4890 ~= GTX 275 4870x2 > 4770 CF> GTX 285 >GTX 280 4890 CF> GTX 285 SLI CF means dual ATi cards, SLI means two of the same nvidia cards right now AMD basically has nvidia beaten either in price or performance. the 4870 vs 260 is very debatable though.
