Gears 2 Vs. Cod5

<div align="center">Leave Comments on Which One You Voted For Who You Did</div>

 

<span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS">I own them both and Gears 2 is much better. If you would have said COD4 then my choice would have been different.</span>

 

Yea Cod5 was a let-down defiantly

 

You can't compare an FPS to a TPS tbh.
Don't like GoW nor CoD but I prefer GoW.

 

QFT


Also, COD5 major disappointment. This topic should be more of GOW2 VS. COD4. Now that's a tough decision. As for the actual topic though. GOW2 ftw. 

 

Gears 2 is probly better then Cod4 too though

The weird thing is, I hated Gears 1

 

First things first, let's not give World at War the dignity of Call of Duty 5 as it's not Call of Duty 5. Activision announced that World at War would be Treyarchs final product for the Call of Duty IP.

With that said, World at War is a complete binary copy of Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare into WW2 setting. Treyarch couldn't even come up with their own engine. The game is a total flop. It has less than 30k players on at peak times, while MW is back up to 150k on weekends and 70k every night.

/shrug.

Looks like GoW2 wins v. W@W.

Only against W@W though.

 

bom

 

This.

+ MW is win.

 

World at War has more of a gory type engine though. The thing that made COD4 such a good game, was the modern day war theme it had. World at War completely killed it. Haven't played GoW2 but I have played the first, and by how bad World at War is, I'd choose GoW2.

 

Get on top of that. Awesome game.

 

GOW 2 Easy Call of Duty 5 was terrible imo, but like someone already said if you asked CoD 4 it would of been diffrent

 

Although I still love GoW2, I agree with everything else in this statement. Facts ftw.

 

I go for cod5, simply the best

 

I'll have to go with Gears 2. Who wants to see another Call of Duty in the WWII era again? Seriously.