[Finished]Brightdarkness Vs Matador

Discussion in 'GR Classic Archive' started by Matador, Oct 25, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Matador

    Matador Well-Known Member

    Age:
    36
    Posts:
    442
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2005
    Location:
    Miami, Fl
    brightdarkness: [​IMG]

    matador: [​IMG]

    Code:
    Rules:
    
    No C4D
    Freestyle
    first to 7 votes wins 40 creds.
    
    post ur sig n i make battle

    good luck.
     
  2. Sapphire Blade

    Sapphire Blade Well-Known Member

    Age:
    37
    Posts:
    1,522
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2006
    brightdarkness gmv,
    like the effects and composition
     
  3. mC² flexik

    mC² flexik Well-Known Member

    Age:
    33
    Posts:
    1,249
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2005
    Location:
    London, UK
    brightdark gmv, more appealing
     
  4. AndromedAxx

    AndromedAxx Well-Known Member

    Age:
    35
    Posts:
    982
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2006
    Location:
    Rhode Island
    matador gmv.....i like the lighting better and imo has better text
     
  5. YourClone

    YourClone Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    469
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2006
    Brida gmv.

    Better balance, flow, and text.
     
  6. 13d Keane

    13d Keane Well-Known Member

    Age:
    33
    Posts:
    2,372
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2006
    Location:
    Nuevo León, México
    Brida gmv.
    Hers looks as if it had c4d, but it doesn't.
     
  7. ClasS

    ClasS Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    84
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2006
    Brida GMV.

    Reasons above.
     
  8. LinkMan11

    LinkMan11 Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    70
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2006
    brida gmv, better colors imo.
     
  9. [.BC.] altriKdout

    [.BC.] altriKdout Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    584
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2006
    Brightdarkness gmv, the other is too bright for me. Good job to both of you though. :)
     
  10. Matador

    Matador Well-Known Member

    Age:
    36
    Posts:
    442
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2005
    Location:
    Miami, Fl
    bah i lost, wont be battling in this forum again, u ppl suck at rating.

    now if the sig isnt dark, its no good...
     
  11. brightdarkness

    brightdarkness Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    71
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2006
    Relax. It is not that people suck at rating, because they aren't rating on a tried and true formula. They are rating on personal preferences, and clearly, personal preferences cannot be be a factor which would deem someone to 'suck'. If you ask for people's opinions on what something looks like, you should expect them to be honest- and clearly that is what is exhibited.

    With that said, there is no tried and true formula for a perfect sig so naturally you couldn't have made a sig that fits the faults of another one you made and expect this one to be good- every sig has a different feeling.

    I liked your entry. But that doesn't make it better or worse than mine, ya know. So..dont take it to heart. Its not like your life is on the line here.

    I'll await my credits though, out of courtesy. -_-
     
  12. Matador

    Matador Well-Known Member

    Age:
    36
    Posts:
    442
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2005
    Location:
    Miami, Fl
    lol sry, its just that im trying to be different.. and ppl just keep on telling me that it needs more neg space, more dark spots.. so i get pissed cuz with these ppl u cant feel good making a new style because they follow 1 style and thats it...

    ill send creds now
     
  13. [.BC.] altriKdout

    [.BC.] altriKdout Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    584
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2006
    I certainly don't follow one style, and if you'd like to know every reason why didn't vote for your tag, then look below.

    -Yours was too bright, the effects in the background weren't very defined.
    -The white pixels don't look very good at all, you have too many of them and they're randomly placed.
    -Your text was barely readable, and I didn't like it much at all.

    And WHY I voted for the other person's tag:

    -The effects were defined well, the texture was very nice.
    -The background may have been a bit empty on the sides, but imo that defined the textures a bit more.
    -The text was nice, a simple, blended gradient text. Easily readable, and aesthetically pleasing.

    And that's why I voted the way I did. And [+]rep for you, don't feel so bad. :)
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page