Sony psp rocks!! great graphics, and acceseries. I wonder how long the battery last per thing tho.. "getting psp for x-mas"
psp just cause it does so much more!! and better games..although ds has some games which dnt looks so bad...still psp getz ma vote
im al for the psp. i mean, i give credit to nintendo for being innovative, but the psp is just more fun to play sometimes. both handhelds dont have such great games out but both lineups r sweet but i give it to the psp
Do not buy a PSP!!!!!!!!!! I just think people shouldn't waste their money.. PSP is a useless piece of ****,unless you are going to use all the functions very frequently.You could get a DS,if it's purely for gaming.But,ummm,let's say you get jealous of the PSP's abilities,you could pay a little extra for an add-on that rivals PSP's abilities.See,PSP is absolutely NOTHING without it's multimedia capabilities.But then the PSP fanboys come back with "Sony is better,because it's built in!!111".They are idiots!!!!!!!! Only an asshole would buy a PSP.Come on,unless you are going to use all of it's abilities,it's an utter waste of money.Oh,by the way,if you think PSP has good,ORIGINAL games,you're wrong.Almost all of it's games are ports.Oh,wow,a portable DVD player.Here's an example........ Dick:Bye,honey,I'm going to go to the park so I can watch the PSP on the bench,when I could normally buy the movie on DVD which is way better than the UMD,and cheaper too. Dick's wife:......... Sony just got PWN3D by a kid.........
Sony owns Nintendo. Back in the day, Nintendo ruled, but now.... PSP KICKS :censored: &#*%#$& :censored: @$$ :censored:
I voted DS. I voted that way because the PSP just has too many features, I like to keep it plain and simple. And i've always been a nintendo fan.... that probably has the most to do w/ it..
So? People have a PS2 and Xbox which include a DVD player but most already have one. If you don't like the PSP for it's features, then don't post arrogant comments. I use all my PSP's features (plus a 1 gig stick) when I'm out and about, and the PSP's games last me a long time. The current three that are lasting me a loooong time are Burnout Legends, Lumines, and Hot Shots Golf. All I need is a simple portable handheld system with no two screens nor a stylus and some good games. I already owned a DS, traded it in for a PSP.
Really,think twice before buying a GAMES console.DS has better games,and always will.Why don't you buy an N-Gage,it's basically a PSP in a phone....
Theres no point convincing others. Sony's fan base is alot bigger than nintendo's and you have to respect others opions.
Indeed. But if Sony owns Nintendo, why do they have most of their ideas, stuff, developers, etc. For example: • Analog and the rumble was first invented by Nintendo. • The controller style of Playstation (without analog and the extra shoulder buttons) is pretty much like the SNES once you think about it. • Games that originally came from the DS: - http://joystiq.com/entry/1234000450061177/ - http://psp.ign.com/articles/657/657995p1.html • A mic for the PSP. - http://www.portagame.com/tapwave/2005/09/2...an_for_sony_psp • Thrid party developers (Contra, Metal Gear, Final Fantasy, etc.) Any more? But I admit, Sony's a good company: • Strong 3rd Party Support • Starting to use technology strength to make SCE a better company. But one thing's questioning me? Would the Ps3 and the PSP appeal to more people even the non-gamers, people who don't really use this type of electronic and the ex-gamers? What would happen if Nintendo never ever existed? Would there be a SCE? Would SCE have strong 3rd party support? Without Nintendo, Sony wouldn't have been this way... For some of the Nintendo's new ideas that Sony has right now, here's what I feel... <a href=\'http://dsandpsp.ytmnd.com/\' target=\'_blank\'>http://dsandpsp.ytmnd.com/</a>
i voted psp because it has better graphics, more capablilities, and because nintendo comes out with a new game boy everyother year and so you have to upgrade
