If your just gonna agree with the above, why post? Your just raising your post count. Atleast graf1cs made a little sense, and was a tad in depth, chipmunk, you had no reason to post saying "Agree with them 2, FO SHO", unless you were going to say something meaningful. I hope to finish this soon, thanks for the comment deadlus.
it was my "comment" on your work bro.. WIP means work in progress and I was stating that your signature is.. a work in progress? did either of them say that? and I am sorry I didnt go in depth.. I didn't want to waste my time with just a wip but here... the background just looks like a distorted stock image just thrown on there with overlay with some smudging also the blue / white thing in the top right doesn't seem like it should be there. and the blue light around the render seems like it creates a wrong color (a.k.a. bad mixture imo) the blending on the render isn't all that great the entire image seems to be to dark lighten it up a bit maybe add some text maybe put in some splatter brushes around the render and erase parts that cover his face and create a clipping mask and move it a bit to give it some more effects.. now let me ask you something since you asked me.. why is it because i just stated basically the same thing grafics said... except he said needs more efx, and i said wip (which I bet you just didn't know what it meant).. do you critique what I wrote? I have no reason to up my post count.. post count doesn't mean crap at all. anyways here is your Critique on your unfinished work. (enjoy.)
Thank you for that. And i've known what wip means, i'm a webdesigner. I haven't been working with sigs that long so i'm not 100% sure on my what-a-wheres.
