Call Of Duty:world At War

Discussion in 'Gaming' started by StarzXx, Nov 12, 2008.

  1. StarzXx

    StarzXx New Member

    Posts:
    1
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2008
    What are your thoughts about it?

    Im getting it this weekend
     
  2. Greasy Pete

    Greasy Pete Senior Member

    Age:
    30
    Posts:
    9,314
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    May 15, 2005
    Location:
    Massachusetts
    im getting it this weekend also, my dad said it was awesome
     
  3. Jiin

    Jiin Well-Known Member

    Age:
    35
    Posts:
    536
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2008
    well, from my experience with the beta it was one of the worst games of 2008. (this is my experience from the beta, my friend now has the game and says they have improved on the graphics of the game only, other than that the game play is still an embarrassment to the series)

    1. gun attachments that do not exist in WWII (silencers, red dots and ACOG scopes from COD4, just they changed the "red" to black) as well as UAV's. <--- all this stuff is a little far fetched for WWII

    2. only 1 playable map, that level in Japan there, forgot the name of it (1 map with vehicles which is basically a nub race to the tanks to win the game + glitching under the map to make the game just that much more incredible!, and the other map which is extremely dark with huts made out of straw where air strikes and bullets pierce through and bushes that you can go deep inside and hide with a shotgun and kill anyone walking by)

    3. AIR STRIKES! more like EARTHQUAAAAKE!! 3 min long airstrikes that do nothing but shake your screen so much, your tv feels the aftershock of it

    4. dogs. 30 dogs that run in packs of 2 that take 3 bullets from a rifle to take down or 1 slash of a knife

    5. this game is so bad and made to comfort the nubs so much they even gave your tanks perks lol

    with all that being said, the multiplayer is horrible and is basically COD4 thrown into COD3 with little thinking involved. but none the less, the campaigns never fail! campaign fuggin awesome! (downloaded for PC) and just loved it, but cant quite say that about the online
     
  4. Shaggy

    Shaggy Administrator Staff Member

    Posts:
    1,775
    Likes Received:
    6
    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2004
    Location:
    Arizona
    I think this has some badd ass graphics. I love the game. I just suck right now and I am getting my ass handed to me, but I like it. I have it for the PC.
     
  5. Riot.

    Riot. Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    270
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2005
    Location:
    509
    Truth! COD4 was/still is ------ing amazing. Everything looks smooth & clean and what not, the same can't be said for COD5. I personally think the graphics are ---- compared to COD4. And I'm hella fed up with using those old ass guns too.

    On a side note, did anyone have their ranking/stats erased/reset online besides me? The first time I played, I went at it for a few hours and got to like 15 or so, and the next time I went to log on, it had me back at 3. Wtf?
     
  6. Disillusion

    Disillusion Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    232
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2008
    Waste of money IMO.
     
  7. popcorn plya

    popcorn plya Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    50
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2006
    Haven't tried it but my friend told me it was pretty good.. but he also mentioned that CoD4 was better.
     
  8. MerDeNoms

    MerDeNoms Well-Known Member

    Age:
    14
    Posts:
    1,333
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2008
    Location:
    Canada
    I find COD4 more fun than WAW, and yeah the whole WW2 thing is played out.
     
  9. .//XeN-

    .//XeN- Well-Known Member

    Age:
    31
    Posts:
    1,387
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2005
    WW2 just isn't meaningful enough.
     
  10. n00b

    n00b Well-Known Member

    Age:
    115
    Posts:
    593
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2005
    Location:
    OREGON PWN3Z
    I've played it multiplayer is good but singleplayer sucks
     
  11. Disillusion

    Disillusion Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    232
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2008
    WWII is the best IMO
     
  12. .//XeN-

    .//XeN- Well-Known Member

    Age:
    31
    Posts:
    1,387
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2005
    It may have been a good war, but it was no Great War.
     
  13. Sock

    Sock Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    1,427
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2005
    They should have a game for the first world war.

    I don't mean "The Great War," I mean the Seven Years War.

    That would be cute.
     
  14. Undertow

    Undertow Senior Member

    Age:
    33
    Posts:
    3,543
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2006
    Tbh. It sucks as with most CoD games.
     
  15. [.BC.] Birds

    [.BC.] Birds Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    739
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2006
    cod 6 was announced already!
     

Share This Page