Counter strike source because.. ITs mad leet.. Its fun. Its quite repetitive so you can get used to it THEN start chaging it up.. Valve as someone else says hooks you up with automatic updates.. Steam makes life easier and with an account you get access to so many other games and all and all.. it just pwns?
CSS is much cheaper then BF2 i think , the graphic of BF2 are way betta then those of CSS so i dunno really
CSS graphics are mad nice.. If they could just perfect the reloading.. It would be really great.. I love the game I mean I'm addicted to it.. Its a team strat game.. BF2 I guess is a little like that but different.
BF2, in my opinion, is a "watch your own a-- but don't lose this for us" type of game. BF2 gets my vote, I own them both, unlike most people that have posted, and I have played them both quite a bit. CSS: The graphics are decent, but the gameplay is the same as CS 1.6, so it's nothing special. BF2: Graphics are WAY better than the other BF games, gameplay is awesome, blah blah blah, just buy it. Or do what I did, buy one and then save up for the other, although I didn't have to save up since they came out at different times and I got them once they came out
i vote BF2 cause its so much better, better grahpic than the other bf's no hackers (or is there?) CS has alot of hackers -GiRLS-
css is better than bf2 because its team work and smaller maps. [/b][/quote] Better team work? I guess there was no reason in putting squads into BF2 then. I own both games but i have to say i never got into CS:S. Pretty much what I played before and it also lured my previous clan. So i hate it's popularity. I decided to go with BF2 because there is a whole variety of kits and the team work is incredible, especially with voice. Also, how could i forget the vechiles.
css is the best like ive played both and i dont realy like the bf2 playing style i just love css and the way it ticks me off go css
