http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3jwjS3Ee_SM...feature=related
<div align="center">Well, from my favorite movie [img] I dont know, i really dont like it that much. c&c is appreciated though</div>
the 1 really takes me off the focal, lighting could be better, but i like version one the most. not bad gj
i love them both, lighting on number one is good, and i love those little swirls around her (whered u get those? :P) second one is awesome too,...
v1 ftw border+text kills it overall very nice
[img] thats the oldest i have saved (After multiple reformats -_-) but i know my first sig was pretty terrible.
thanks more please:)
<div align="center">Just finished this one [img] [img] c&c</div>
very nice, even though this sotw is extremely stupid.
i cant even tell what it is:P read some tutorials, download / buy some psds, best way to get better quick
[img] bw version i think its better, cant see the bad coloring
thanks^ idn, i havent really done any sigs in a while 2nd one in a few months more c&c please:)
very nice realism piece :)
^ it does.
Weird as in the render:P
<div align="center">Newest - v1 [img] (less light) v2 [img] (more light) </div>
I dont know how you do it pulse but you do, i love your style.
great depth/quality, but a little weird:P
i like it too, the lighting is perfect imo
<div align="center">Its been a few months since I last made a sig so [img] [img] c&c please</div>
NO PROBLEM
he hasnt fought in a while but hes still a beast http://youtube.com/watch?v=LciIie3a_bQ
In 9th grade, some kid was talking alot of ---- about my mom, and naturally i talked ---- back. After class he threw me into a locker and elbowed...
the gaussian blur effect on it is making it look LQ, take that off. maybe tone down the light source a tad and add more of a focal (sharpen...
#3 is hot not feelin the rest, too blurry/grainy, fix that and theyll be much better (maybe topaz aswell).
Separate names with a comma.