nah the sig actually looks blurry on gamerenders when i post it... but the odd thing is its only for me. everyone else says it looks sharp like...
i like the colored version also.
i like it :)
what is that thing? i'm personally not a big fan of the whole purple. it looks good but looks like something is missing... not quiet sure what.
whats up with the fang. and get rid of that light source on the right. it just makes it look add and messes up the focal point.
ok thanks for replying so fast... i was having a lot of problem... the sig looks blurry on GR; however, on photobucket and on PS it looks sharp......
hey does the text look blurry or sharpened? i really need help... these sigs look different on my comp... btw i agree with what you said; however,...
ok thanks... its still kind of odd though.
really you guys don't see a difference in the font? ... maybe its just me... i dont know... can someone else confirm this?
[img] http://s244.photobucket.com/albums/gg28/Re...nt=toohuman.png
i'm saving it as png. and its really sharp on flickr and photobucket;however, when i post it on GR it sees really blurry.
hey why do i my sigs look so blurry when i post them on GR?
C&C 2nd sig [img] [img] [img] edit: different version.
what tut did you follow? the top right needs some working and i'm not really liking the border, also the lighting needs some work and dont like...
that was pretty dumb....
C&C please [img] ps: anyone know why the text is so blurry?... the overall image a lot sharper on PS and on flickr.
personally i like your other works better...
to much stuff going around and the blending and stuff needs to be worked better. no real flow or focal point.
i like it looks good. a lot better than the gow one.
posted an edited version
yeah kov i totally agree with you :\ first sig in like 2 years...
C&C orignal [img]
looks really good.
to pixelated on the left side. no sense of real flow or focal point.i just kind of like the color.
ill do it.
Separate names with a comma.
