4/10. horribly unblended and bad text
Those 2 look ripped - they both have different names and both arent yours. I'm not even going to rate them.
7/10, nice but too sparkly - dont like the text either
Leethal- 1. 6/10 - namrac tut :P 2. 7/10 - kinda boring but decent outcome
ALPH. Stop wasting space just to get your sig rated. You rated mine 5 times now, STOP. Wait until someone else rates mine from now. Jeez. @ toxic...
Hey alph? Stop rerating my sigs over and over.. Since i just had to say this ill rate it again with the same rating - 6/10.
@alph 6/10, doesnt flow well @crobo 5/10, just kinda ugly :/
7/10, 8/10.
@alph 7/10, bad text and pretty empty on the sides
@ace 2/10 sry m8. bad brushed bg and horribly blended. @markers 8/10, not bad.
6/10 for both.
Ace- 4/10
7/10 for the first one, a bit strange on the left 9/10 for the 2nd, really like that one :)
5/10 for both, kinda newbish no offence. just practice :). and i strongly disagree with djsam's rating :P
1. 6.5/10, strange render for the bg, and bad text. 2. 5/10, just not feelin it bro
1. 7.5/10 2. 6.5/10
Nooo my 1337 creds xD
7/10, render doesnt match mg, and everythings kinda blurry
8/10 really like it, but the w00t text kills it :/
5/10.. old style tech doesnt look very good.
5/10 sry bro, pixel stretches just are xP.
7/10 overall, a bit busy in them
6/10.. Bidirectional smudge
whao i like the 1st one 8/10 not too fond of the 2nd 1 tho, 7/10
Just telling ya - not with tuts -_-. And those are recent ones after about a 6 month break from gfx - been on gunz for a while then quit xD
Separate names with a comma.
