Signature Skills..

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by Rosin'Sohna, Sep 17, 2005.

  1. Rosin'Sohna

    Rosin'Sohna Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    475
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2005
    Whatcha think..


    if you read through that, you will notice someone said smaller the more skills, right? What do you think on the topic, of smalelr sigs the more skills of course.

    The smaller sigs, all you really have to do is try and resize a good render, and resize the brushes to look nice, and you've basically got a small signature, so what's so different with that and having a big signature and using bigger renders and brushes?
     
  2. Phat Albert

    Phat Albert Well-Known Member

    Age:
    36
    Posts:
    3,829
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2004
    Making a 3000x3000 image takes hours and hours to make because you have to fill it up with lots of different things and still make it look nice. The smaller it is, the easier it is. I can make a really good 400x100 sig in 5 minutes and a okay wallpaper in a hour and a half.
     
  3. Rosin'Sohna

    Rosin'Sohna Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    475
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2005
    I can make a pretty cool wallpaper with 15 minutes of dedication. ^.^
    But, yeah.. the only great graphic makers there are Adr3n and 579. other than that, the other's are dimwits about it.
     
  4. Fitz

    Fitz Well-Known Member

    Age:
    34
    Posts:
    1,493
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2005
    Location:
    Maryville, Tennessee
    yeah, littler is harder, and bigger is harder, in their own ways...littler is harder because you have less room to work with, so stuff gets bunched up easy. Bigger's harder because you have so much room to work with, and it's hard to cover it all up and make it all flow right
     
  5. iDesign

    iDesign Senior Member

    Posts:
    958
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2005
    That person that said that is wrong. Nobody makes big sigs because they are too big and have you ever tryed to re-size brushing *pukes* :|
     
  6. Rosin'Sohna

    Rosin'Sohna Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    475
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2005
    Mhhm, that's why I love 400.100 - 450,150, balanced if you ask me, anyone want to explain to them the difference? half of them are incopetent in such understandings and never listen to me.

    EDIT: Yes, I have tried to resize brushes. and a few pixels is hardly damaging.. however, I am languid. T.T' And big sig's are not always 'to big,' I love bigger signatures,a t least 400x100, it allows me to just work with everything... and I hate zooming on smaller signatures.
     
  7. _Arctic_

    _Arctic_ Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    1,500
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2005
    You call them dimwits, when in all honesty you are a dimwit yourself.

    People don't make big sigs because they are hard, they don't make them because the stretch out other peoples screens and cause dial-up users to lag.

    Yes, smaller tags are a bit harder to make. You have to work in brushing/other elements and to make a GOOD sig you have to have a bit of negative space.

    ~My 2 cents.
     
  8. Rosin'Sohna

    Rosin'Sohna Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    475
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2005
    I didn't say I did. I will make signatures of any size when I want. All it is to me is jsut a little less or a little more work.
    And on some forums 450x150 actually work. I could care less if someone has to run 800x600 cause they're monitors are so tiny, and I don't worry about the dial-up user's, their choice. They can have something else and get dialup, or lose something else and get Broadband. life is a game of choices, this and this, or that and this.
     
  9. _Arctic_

    _Arctic_ Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    1,500
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2005
    So you'd rather stay making crappy huge sigs, rather than helping out dial up users and people with small moniters, and learn how to do smaller sigs?

    And, yes, life Indeed is a game of choices. But have you ever stopped to think, that maybe the people visiting the same forums you do, may be in a worse position than you? Maybe, their computer was an old one, they got from a friend. Maybe, they don't have the money to pay for brodband? Huh. maybe?

    ~Psssh.
     
  10. Rosin'Sohna

    Rosin'Sohna Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    475
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2005
    Not my problem if they do, now it would be different if I knew the person. I'm not going to turn this into a flame war. And jsut because a signature is larger than 380x110 or such doesn't mean it's crappy, it can just have more content.
     
  11. FM Lawlhalla

    FM Lawlhalla Senior Member

    Posts:
    8,061
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2005
    i dont liek images that are to big.
    i jsut use 350*150
     
  12. _Arctic_

    _Arctic_ Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    1,500
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2005
    I'm talking about the quality of the content. Have you ever noticed, on real graphic sites, MOST don't have full on banners? Why? Because they're so hard to make, and they just look unprofessional.
     
  13. Master

    Master Senior Member

    Age:
    38
    Posts:
    6,560
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2005
    Location:
    Florida
    Smaller sigs just has a bigger effect, they look better.
     
  14. Rosin'Sohna

    Rosin'Sohna Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    475
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2005
    Depends on who makes them.
     
  15. Master

    Master Senior Member

    Age:
    38
    Posts:
    6,560
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2005
    Location:
    Florida
    Technically, or atleast to me; Nah. Even your 2 current sigs made smaller would be better then they are now.
     

Share This Page