Michael Jackson Vs. 10 Year Old Boys

Discussion in 'GR Classic Archive' started by Kazuya, Sep 5, 2005.

  1. sergo

    sergo Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    1,243
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    May 19, 2005
    Michael Jackson: gmv

    i know the second one looks much more professional and better but it just my style and great color though i like them both
     
  2. Kazuya

    Kazuya Senior Member

    Age:
    37
    Posts:
    5,858
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2005
    Location:
    United Kingdom - Scotland - Glasgow
    WHY THE HELL DID YOU LOWER HTID'S IMAGE QUALITY ON HIS PEICE!!!?

    Were you trying to purposly make his look bad so you can win? [/b][/quote]
    I didn't lower the image quality. Imageshack did. So don't even bother.

    AND THE REASON WHY I DIDN'T POST THE NAMES IS SO PEOPLE WOULDN'T "HATE VOTE"

    BUT YOU. TOTALLY KILLED THAT IDEA.
     
  3. highfkinghT

    highfkinghT Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    191
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2005
    I didn't lower the image quality. Imageshack did. So don't even bother.

    AND THE REASON WHY I DIDN'T POST THE NAMES IS SO PEOPLE WOULDN'T "HATE VOTE"

    BUT YOU. TOTALLY KILLED THAT IDEA. [/b][/quote]
    Well then dont host it on imageshack. Simple as that. Because the quality is really just dreadfull compared to the original.
     
  4. O RLY

    O RLY Well-Known Member

    Age:
    40
    Posts:
    1,278
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2005
    Location:
    Hmmmm
    I didn't lower the image quality. Imageshack did. So don't even bother.

    AND THE REASON WHY I DIDN'T POST THE NAMES IS SO PEOPLE WOULDN'T "HATE VOTE"

    BUT YOU. TOTALLY KILLED THAT IDEA. [/b][/quote]
    imageshack dosent lower image quality, you have to lower the quality and host it on there.

    BTW: why do you think i told everybody that htid did the second one, because you ----ed with his stuff and messed his up so you can get more votes.
     
  5. Kazuya

    Kazuya Senior Member

    Age:
    37
    Posts:
    5,858
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2005
    Location:
    United Kingdom - Scotland - Glasgow
    Oh its on now. Now your accusing me wit' screwing wit' peoples stuff?

    I'LL REPEAT IT ONCE MORE. I HOSTED IT ON IMAGESHACK. IT LOWERED THE QUALTY. NOT ME. ALL I DID WAS HOST IT. THE BATTLE TOOK PLACE BETWEEN - STUNT AND HTID. I HAD NO REASON TO LOWER THE DAMN QUALITY OF THE PICTURE.

    YOU HAVE NO RIGHT TO SAY THAT AND YOU HAVE NO PROOF AT ALL. JUST YOUR MISGUIDED JUDGING.

    I've never had to bloody type in caps soo much till now. I told you once that I didn't do it - and you didn't believe me. Well, if your still not satisfied - ask STUNT and HTiD. I never lower any of the images qualities - OKAY.

    And your quite short minded for telling everyone even though we did this to STOP hate voting.
     
  6. Acksaw

    Acksaw Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    330
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2005
    I like them both but Jacko's gets mine slightly
     
  7. Demokata

    Demokata Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    742
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2004
    imageshack dosent lower image quality, you have to lower the quality and host it on there.

    BTW: why do you think i told everybody that htid did the second one, because you ----ed with his stuff and messed his up so you can get more votes. [/b][/quote]
    Sorry to bust your bubble but imageshack does lower the quality when hosted.

    You may not noctice at first but if you compare an original picture in PS then the one hostd Imageshack you will see a diffrence.
     
  8. S t ú n t

    S t ú n t Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    72
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2005
    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]


    Can YOU tell the difference? One is hosted on imageshack, one is the link htid sent me. Wheres the reduced quality? I see hardly any.
     
  9. flipn0tic

    flipn0tic Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    2,764
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2005
    Not a hate vote here... but #2 clearly owns #1... it actually reminds me of NFT's style, it's pro.

    vote 10 yr old boys.
     
  10. Vedder

    Vedder Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    113
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2005
    MJ has my vote i think the colors help it more and i like that i can see the actual render alot beter then LBs either way nice C4D work you guys :D
     
  11. highfkinghT

    highfkinghT Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    191
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2005
    [​IMG]


    Lol YEAH IT LOOKS TOTALLY THE SAME MAN!!!



    you should have just left it on my server.
     
  12. Jassiki

    Jassiki Well-Known Member

    Age:
    36
    Posts:
    107
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2005
    Michael Jackson hands down. the sea colors rawk.. but i might be bias... renderboi89 knows why :P

    :D

    *but i know this aint really mike.. but still :P*
     
  13. Hybridx

    Hybridx Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    205
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2005
    10 year old boys is dark, simple effective and GREAT i like it.

    btw this is my 100th post!! =]
     
  14. Berniej

    Berniej Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    342
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2005
    10YearOldBoys GMV .. I looks nice and realistic
     
  15. ixiix

    ixiix Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    451
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2005
    Location:
    California
    10 year olds gmv, nice overall look
     

Share This Page