Rate The Sig Above You ..

I don't really know what rating to give it, you should have made the white around the edges transparent. It looks good, but i don't think i can give it more than a 5/10, seeing as how theres no render.

 

i decided to make a new sig right now,since my other one was too plain, ill give you 9.5/10 wispa :lol:

 

6.5/10

nice background, don't like the render...don't like the font either..

 

^^^render doesn fit in to well...
background is nice
5/10

 

Love the render, the BG very original. 9/10

 

@Silverwing

1st one: It looks good, but it doesnt appeal to me as much as the 2nd one, i think the bg needs slightly more color. 7.5/10

2nd one: I really like it, the bg, colors and text suit the render really well, very nice work. 8.5/10

 

Both are pretty nice but dont like the left one as much....7/10

 

1. real nice wow its amazing 10/10
2.halo is whored but still awsome job9/10

 

1st-10/10 (Link)
2nd-make the text more noticeable 9/10 (sub-zero)
3rd-10/10 (Yuna)
4th-render too bright and bg needs workk 7/10 (Rikku)

 

i like them all 9/10 for them

 

@ Rayne

Ill just rate the first one...

I love the text its awesome, the colors are really nice i i like the BG, overall 9/10 its nice

 

1st- text needs work 9/10
2nd-dont like the white brushing 9/10

 

Both are nice, i like the photomanip alot. 8/10 on both, GJ

 

1st :7/10 dont like the colors 2nd: same for the same reason 3rd 8/10 i like the colours and render matches : D

 

it isn't a photo manip!!!!!
how many times do i have to say that!?
should i right "its not a photomanip" in the sig itself to make people understand?
dont take it personal though
anyways....
1st-text needs work 9/10
2nd-there is too much empty black space but i like the concept 9/10