Lower Your Iq Fast

My main problem with Bush is that Kerry can explain his actions where as Bush just repeats what he did and retroactively re-writes history. Now, Michael Moore may be a whiny bitch buy he's damn good at point some of the more blatant things out. I don't get why the american public don't call Bush on it when he lies to them. Is the average person just too lazy (the answer is yes) to do a little research? Or is it just that much easier to accept what he is saying NOW?

About the whole supporting/bashing of the war in Iraq. Kerry said he supported the idea of the war based on available information and his constituent's points of view. He said (and IMO rightly so) that that is different from making the final decision. There is a stark difference between supporting an idea and personally making a crucial decision. Do you think that everyone who supported dropping nuclear weapons on Japan experienced the same guilt or retrospective thinking as the current president at the time (Johnson?)?

Bush is an idiot and a puppet used by his entire staff as a conduit through which to continue his father's presidency and Kerry has to dumb himself down so as not to intimidate the averave american voter... I ceratinly think Bush is more reprehensible but I'm not sure which is more sad.

 

If you wanna have a political battle, take it to political forums.

Locked.