> Discussion Thread < : Cars !

Discussion in 'SOTW Archive' started by Flamesy, Jul 24, 2005.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Page 12 of 16
  1. Jul 27, 2005 at 3:13 AM #166
    DeMiZe

    DeMiZe Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    582
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2004
    i'm not sure if this has already been brought up, and i'm not going to indict anyone explicitly... but does this look like a really bad rip attempt to anyone? notice how the width of the bottom amendment doesn't match up to the rest of the sig... as well as the name on the sideskirt of the car.
    |
    V
    [​IMG]
     
  2. Jul 27, 2005 at 4:12 AM #167
    Primaryvivid

    Primaryvivid Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    108
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2005
    http://www.deviantart.com/view/20570003/

    In the rules, Im sure it says you cant use anyone elses work in your sig, the car in there was clearly not made by you, and you gave no credit to the original maker; infact I have a feeling you didnt even bother to ask permission to use it, wouldnt that be considered a rip?

    And apparently the same would go for xFANCY_MOOSEx, seeing as he used the same "stock"
     
  3. Jul 27, 2005 at 4:26 AM #168
    blacklabelwood

    blacklabelwood Well-Known Member

    Age:
    22
    Posts:
    1,165
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2004
    ^ VERY good point, its a rip to me.
     
  4. Jul 27, 2005 at 6:07 AM #169
    UV Moose

    UV Moose Well-Known Member

    Age:
    36
    Posts:
    4,908
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2005
    http://www.deviantart.com/view/20570003/

    In the rules, Im sure it says you cant use anyone elses work in your sig, the car in there was clearly not made by you, and you gave no credit to the original maker; infact I have a feeling you didnt even bother to ask permission to use it, wouldnt that be considered a rip?

    And apparently the same would go for xFANCY_MOOSEx, seeing as he used the same "stock" [/b][/quote]
    Ah, didn't know it was taken off of DA, guess I'm out of this one then
     
  5. Jul 27, 2005 at 7:55 AM #170
    Mithras

    Mithras Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    72
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2005
    It's the same as CGTalk.
     
  6. Jul 27, 2005 at 9:29 AM #171
    Namrac

    Namrac Well-Known Member

    Age:
    35
    Posts:
    1,738
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2005
    Ah, didn't know it was taken off of DA, guess I'm out of this one then [/b][/quote]
    ^^^Same. Ripping was not my intention. I'll remove my entry then.
     
  7. Jul 27, 2005 at 11:48 AM #172
    nayr`

    nayr` Well-Known Member

    Age:
    32
    Posts:
    2,869
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    May 28, 2005
    Location:
    Fort Dodge, IOWA
    I dont know why I entered, I hate car sigs.
     
  8. Jul 27, 2005 at 2:39 PM #173
    Advanc3_T3ch

    Advanc3_T3ch Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    1,795
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    May 31, 2005
    Location:
    .:: SoM3 Wh3r3 In YoUr P4nT5 ::.
    http://www.deviantart.com/view/20570003/

    In the rules, Im sure it says you cant use anyone elses work in your sig, the car in there was clearly not made by you, and you gave no credit to the original maker; infact I have a feeling you didnt even bother to ask permission to use it, wouldnt that be considered a rip?
    [/b][/quote]
    Hardly any one here made the car in their sig, and also, didn't give credit to their maker. and, didn't have permission from the maker. I'm sure half the cars in there are copywrighted material owned by some photography company. Gamewallpapers is the same.
     
  9. Jul 27, 2005 at 4:33 PM #174
    -=V i c e=-

    -=V i c e=- Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    205
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2005
    Flipnotic nice sig bro..dang thats so uber!!

    imo:

    Killer
    Flipnotic
    Me :D
     
  10. Jul 27, 2005 at 5:34 PM #175
    Primaryvivid

    Primaryvivid Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    108
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2005
    Hardly any one here made the car in their sig, and also, didn't give credit to their maker. and, didn't have permission from the maker. I'm sure half the cars in there are copywrighted material owned by some photography company. Gamewallpapers is the same. [/b][/quote]
    Theres a difference between stock and reference material and someones work. If I were to go to depthcore, take one of their images, slap it onto a smaller canvas and add text, I'd be doing the same thing they did, and Im positive you guys would be down my throat about how I ripped it.
     
  11. Jul 27, 2005 at 6:04 PM #176
    Crazypl86

    Crazypl86 Well-Known Member

    Age:
    39
    Posts:
    2,662
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2005
    Location:
    IL, USA
    Question: y are DA renders banned?
     
  12. Jul 27, 2005 at 7:13 PM #177
    .Valo.

    .Valo. Well-Known Member

    Age:
    39
    Posts:
    938
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2004
    Location:
    Finland
    lol it may not be in the rules, but ur making urself look like a n00b with that sig.
     
  13. Jul 27, 2005 at 9:28 PM #178
    Primaryvivid

    Primaryvivid Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    108
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2005
  14. Jul 27, 2005 at 9:36 PM #179
    Primaryvivid

    Primaryvivid Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    108
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2005
  15. Jul 27, 2005 at 9:47 PM #180
    Primaryvivid

    Primaryvivid Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    108
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2005
    Because its not stock are for you to throw into your signature. Its artwork that someone spent their time working on. For you to just go and take it is wrong.

    And heres a thread stating this is wrong, incase you wanted to go by that.

    http://www.gamerenders.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=52058
     
Page 12 of 16
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page