Rate The Sig Above You ..

Discussion in 'Graphics discussion' started by TheGrudge214, Jan 5, 2002.

  1. DaRk AsSaSsIn.

    DaRk AsSaSsIn. Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    216
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2005
    please rate this one
    click the thumbnail

    [​IMG]
     
  2. monkeyronin

    monkeyronin Well-Known Member

    Age:
    33
    Posts:
    160
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    May 16, 2005
    Location:
    Toronto
    7/10

    its a little plain, not nearly as good as your current sigs
     
  3. LW-Frozenblade

    LW-Frozenblade Member

    Posts:
    21
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2005
    Not a fan of the nature on 5/10.
    Tranformers one is pretty good 8/10.
     
  4. Sneaky

    Sneaky Well-Known Member

    Age:
    32
    Posts:
    1,507
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    May 13, 2005
    dont EVER use wind on a render i repeat dont EVER do taht and text isnt good work on it man 4/10 =\
     
  5. negrodamas

    negrodamas Well-Known Member

    Age:
    38
    Posts:
    158
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2005
    pretty good i like the top more 8.5/10 for top 8/10 bottom
     
  6. Renagade

    Renagade Senior Member

    Age:
    34
    Posts:
    9,158
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2005
    Location:
    South Carolina
    I like your multicoloring. The render is a little too blurry for me though.

    8/10

    Rate vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv

    [​IMG]
     
  7. Liquid Snake

    Liquid Snake Well-Known Member

    Age:
    35
    Posts:
    105
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2005
    Location:
    slidell, LA
    i always loved warcraft 3...and ok with the colors and blending 7/10


    rate the top sig!!! tell me what i can do better...cause i know its not good compared to the masters here lol

    NVM just rate em both!!!!
     
  8. DarkRaven

    DarkRaven Well-Known Member

    Age:
    33
    Posts:
    113
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2005
    Location:
    Grand Falls-Windsor
    well your obviously new to this...try and work on making everything flow together, like matching colors and such. They need to be smooth. But ull get better so keep at it
     
  9. Sneaky

    Sneaky Well-Known Member

    Age:
    32
    Posts:
    1,507
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    May 13, 2005
    Take out the render in 2nd and itd be 20/10 itd look TIGHT but well the render makes it down so take out render and 1st one is good to 8/10

    RATE this one
     
  10. Mousyman

    Mousyman Well-Known Member

    Age:
    34
    Posts:
    58
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2005
    Location:
    Wisconsin
    I like it a lot. It's very well blended. Not quite sure what the picture is from but it looks cool.
     
  11. Eturnal Darkness

    Eturnal Darkness Well-Known Member

    Age:
    42
    Posts:
    231
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2005
    Location:
    my inner mind
    pretty cool needs some work on text and may be a lil more color :)
     
  12. joethehoe

    joethehoe Well-Known Member

    Age:
    32
    Posts:
    1,127
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2005
    Location:
    Around Detroit
    8/10 text could use some work, bg good and so is render
     
  13. Renagade

    Renagade Senior Member

    Age:
    34
    Posts:
    9,158
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2005
    Location:
    South Carolina
    I like the bottom one... Text needs some work and the render isn't blended the best. 7/10



    [​IMG]
     
  14. highvoltage001

    highvoltage001 Well-Known Member

    Age:
    34
    Posts:
    811
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2005
    Location:
    behind you
    1st = nice render and good blending. bg is good but the txt needs a little improvement 8/10
    2nd = very nice sig I like it specially the color orange nice txt also 8.5/10
     
  15. against

    against Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    378
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2004
    No focal point, text is bad. 4/10
     

Share This Page