I think the majority of this foum agree that it is you that looks like the ass, your no trend setter our no graphics legend, your a spotty little child trying his hardest to piss people off and raise his "e-cool ego" just that little bit more. If this place is not good enough for your "leet" ways then just go. I doubt you have made one decent post on these forums. All you do is bash on other peoples work and threads. There is this thing called fresh air and sunlight, I suggest you go out into it, have a few beers, maybe find yourself a girlfriend, then when you come back you can be a litle less angry at everyone. Its not their fault you was a deprived child. good day
The majority of this forum couldn't give a ----, its just you three littl kids. I set your trends, you follow what I set forth, can't accept the truth? Oh well, learn to live with it. Theres a search button for a reason, so you can see your wrong.....again. Funny, I was going to tell you the same thing, its common knowledge that anyont who takes signatures so seriously is always some pasty white nerd that couldn't get laid if he offered a girl a million dollars. Now kindly take your head out of your ass and jump off that cliff onto those sharp rocks, rid the world of your stupidity.
FFS your an idiot? You dont honestly think its just us 3? Ive talked to multiple people who all think your being an ass. You just keep going on and on about what you define "Art" as. You think people dont care about waht us 3 are saying, nope, they dont give a f*** about what YOU are saying because you are so damn obviously wrong. 25% of "Real" artists...2 things about that. You dont define art and no one else does and also...25% agrees sigs arent art? Oh, looks like we got a majority? And Yes ok, I realise all you are going to do is define your own version of art again and restate the same point...are you really so stupid that you cant at least recognise the truth AND come up with another comeback all at once? Is that too hard for little sushi wushi?
I think it is, Broken. I think it's just too hard for him to accept the truth. Everything that Sushi says from on now I'm going to ignore. I'm not even going to post in this topic, and I suggest you do the same. He's not going to quit arguing, so just let him think he's right.
Good thank you for accepting the fact that im right. Signatures aren't art, i've proven my point over and over, you just can't accept that. And broken, i've spoken with 50 other people and they agree with me, so looks like I have the majority. Game, set and match, now jump off the cliff with your buddy.
Pulling number out of our ass now are we? I bet at least 51 member here agree that sigs are art. Times that by 7 and it looks like I got the majority. Ya see? I can do it too. Now "shut your face"
Art: Compiling different types of media into a stable visial form, pleasing to the eye. Visual basis of expression and feeling. Though sigs are common and 'trendwhoreish' , theres a site for everything. And this one just happnes to focus more on sigs than anything else. Sushi, its not like 'real' art is banned here. People just choose not to show it. Though "slapping brushs in a rectanlge with an image" may not seem like "good, respectable" art, in reality, everything is art. Just look around, you can find something. For instance, In a book I read once, there was a painting sold for over 30,000 dollars, and all it was was a red box painted on a canvas. Let me say it again, 'a RED BOX, painted on a canvas, was sold for over 30,000 dollars' And don't say "Well that persons a retard" because art is in the eye of the beholder.
And theres a box of sand with a rock in it at a museum in NY I believe. sigs= not art, plain and simple. so like ice cube said, game, set and match. whats that, 10 games to 0? Damn, im good And for link the dink, I have over a million people agreeing with me about sigs not being art, where are these people you ask? www.deviantart.com. Now, looks like I have the majority, consider yourself pwned up the ass.
I so totally agree with Ms. Sushi ,signatures are not art ,deal with it .... Oh and could you be more unnoriginal? vD ,dC , you probly dont know what Im talking about ...
Erm yes because all of DA agrees with you, thats why thousands of people make brush packs for sigs and post their sigs. And people on DA comment, next time look at your own data. You think you can go against the real definition of art Ill repeat it shall I? Compiling different types of media into a stable visial form, pleasing to the eye. Visual basis of expression and feeling. Different types of Media, so brushes...fonts etc, thats 1-0 to us so far. Pleasing to the eye, thousands upon thousands of people like to have sigs in their USer Cp etc...and that includes you yourself so I guess thats 2-0 to us. And then finally a basis of feeling etc. YOU! Have no right to say people dont put feelings in their work,...because they do and I got sigs to prove it. Someone dies, make a sig expressing yourself, get it of your chest.... Art is what the person makes it, its what they feel...and you have no right to define what other people can feel, what they see in their own work. YOU dont have the right and nobody else in the world does. Oh Sushi, I think we can safely say....Game, Set, Match