Ps3 Sucks..xbox 360 Rules..

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by UV Soaked, May 25, 2005.

  1. pags

    pags Member

    Posts:
    23
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    May 22, 2005
    I own both consoles buddy ol' pal, xbox is better on every account, so why wouldn't I post my opinion when someone tries to say sony has a better console?

    @iceturd, whatever his name is

    Your gonna compare gameplay on a button masher(I assume by sc your talking about soul calibur)? Im talking about actual games, you know, splinter cell, PoP.

    If your talking about the gameplay being the same for splinter cell, then buddy, you obviously haven't played it on the xbox, theres a big difference. [/b][/quote]
    http://www.gizmodo.com/gadgets/home-entert...c-g5-104295.php

    Ouch...Oh, btw, all of the PS3 clips from E3 were not CG. They were either real-time or cinematics MADE with the actual gameplay. Regardless, both xbox360 and PS3 have great graphics. I am not arguing that PS3 is better, just saying they weren't CG.


    Gameplay on ported games are EXACTLY the same. The only difference is graphics because XBOX has the most up-to-date hardware of the 3 consoles. If any of the consoles has the best games, I'm gonna say nintendo. That is where the gameplay is at. Halo gets boring, as does halo 2. All of the Zeldas are GREAT for gameplay. Even the ocarina of time port to GC was fun to play after beating it on N64. Also, the Resident Evil series is incredibly fun. RE Zero, remake of RE1, and RE4 are awesome. Metroid series is awesome. With the revolution coming out, which gives access to basically every nintendo title within the span of SNES, NES, and N64, the amount of awesome games just won't stop: Conkers (the original), GOLDENEYE (----IN AWESOME), the Zeldas, Mario 64 (classic game), starfox, etc. If you are looking for gameplay, that's where it's at. Halo is ONE game for ONE console. Not much variety there.

    Of course, all the fanboys here will never admit defeat or even come close to agreeing.
     
  2. Sub.wtf?

    Sub.wtf? Well-Known Member

    Age:
    36
    Posts:
    755
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2005
    Location:
    Maryland,USA
    these will all be great comsoles but i will be getting the PS3

    reason being i dont like nintendo because other than RE4 the games are too childlike for me

    xbox i hate the controllers and dont like the games as much

    but palystation i have grown to love and couldnt use any other controller besides the one they use and the games are just so great
     
  3. .sexed

    .sexed Well-Known Member

    Age:
    40
    Posts:
    1,369
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2005
    Location:
    Wisconsin
    http://www.gizmodo.com/gadgets/home-entert...c-g5-104295.php

    Ouch...Oh, btw, all of the PS3 clips from E3 were not CG. They were either real-time or cinematics MADE with the actual gameplay. Regardless, both xbox360 and PS3 have great graphics. I am not arguing that PS3 is better, just saying they weren't CG.


    Gameplay on ported games are EXACTLY the same. The only difference is graphics because XBOX has the most up-to-date hardware of the 3 consoles. If any of the consoles has the best games, I'm gonna say nintendo. That is where the gameplay is at. Halo gets boring, as does halo 2. All of the Zeldas are GREAT for gameplay. Even the ocarina of time port to GC was fun to play after beating it on N64. Also, the Resident Evil series is incredibly fun. RE Zero, remake of RE1, and RE4 are awesome. Metroid series is awesome. With the revolution coming out, which gives access to basically every nintendo title within the span of SNES, NES, and N64, the amount of awesome games just won't stop: Conkers (the original), GOLDENEYE (----IN AWESOME), the Zeldas, Mario 64 (classic game), starfox, etc. If you are looking for gameplay, that's where it's at. Halo is ONE game for ONE console. Not much variety there.

    Of course, all the fanboys here will never admit defeat or even come close to agreeing. [/b][/quote]
    The demo's were not real time, they were CG movies done to spec, they didn't have any devkits for the games, so they had no ingame footage.
     
  4. pags

    pags Member

    Posts:
    23
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    May 22, 2005
    http://ps3.ign.com/articles/618/618430p4.html

    Either way, the REAL models, textures, maps, sounds, etc. were used to make whatever we saw, whether or not it was realtime or a movie made of game assets, so let's move on from that.

    Also, who is "they"? Be a little more specific please.

    What IS disappointing about the XBOX360 at E3 is THIS:
    http://www.gizmodo.com/gadgets/home-entert...c-g5-104295.php.
     
  5. MaynardsTOOL

    MaynardsTOOL Well-Known Member

    Age:
    40
    Posts:
    1,730
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2005
    The demo's were not real time, they were CG movies done to spec, they didn't have any devkits for the games, so they had no ingame footage. [/b][/quote]
    Plenty of software developers already have PS3 devkits.....are you new to the whole gaming scene or something?
     
  6. .sexed

    .sexed Well-Known Member

    Age:
    40
    Posts:
    1,369
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2005
    Location:
    Wisconsin
    They have movies, not devkits, sony's inability to answer the question "is it in game graphics" proves it.
     
  7. mK-JuNIoR

    mK-JuNIoR Active Member

    Posts:
    32
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2004
    box 360 looks a bit better gfx wise seen a few pics have ps2 got the turn off button on the control like xbox?
     
  8. MaynardsTOOL

    MaynardsTOOL Well-Known Member

    Age:
    40
    Posts:
    1,730
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2005
    They have movies, not devkits, sony's inability to answer the question "is it in game graphics" proves it. [/b][/quote]
    So they're already starting development on games....but they have no devkits. Wow, they sure could have fooled me- I MUST be an idiot! :lol:











    :rolleyes:
     
  9. .killjoy

    .killjoy Well-Known Member

    Age:
    35
    Posts:
    1,565
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2004
    they are equally matched in porformance, but gfx designers are lazy and dont wanan use all procceseing speed like always
     
  10. LucasEdge

    LucasEdge Well-Known Member

    Age:
    120
    Posts:
    774
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    May 13, 2005
    the one thing idont like about the ps3 is the freien controller looks a damn bomerang... i mean...cmon lol popele wil play boomerang...instead of ps3 ..actually they wont...and i dont know if you can "play" boomerang..lol what evs i hear the ps3 has slower rate of somehting or other that the x box.?!!? SI THIS TRUE!!
     
  11. MaynardsTOOL

    MaynardsTOOL Well-Known Member

    Age:
    40
    Posts:
    1,730
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2005
    I had a controller shaped like that for my PS1, except it was rubbery and blue- and it felt like a dream... I don't doubt the comfortability one bit at this point. If I wanted to bash on controllers, I could go back to how much I thought Xbox's original controller reminded me of a brick.
     
  12. GraphiK

    GraphiK Member

    Posts:
    15
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    May 24, 2005
    I think Xbox 360 is going to run over PS3 but everyone doesnt think the same o_O
     
  13. icebergslim1827

    icebergslim1827 Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    60
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2005
    The PS2 Vs Xbox war in my eyes is alrdy over, with PS2 dominating. PS2 unit sales are far greater then Xbox unit sales.

    North American Console sales since releases;

    PS2 Units sold; 25.8 million+
    Xbox Units sold; 10.8 million+
    Gamecube Units sold; 8.3 million+

    So people that say Xbox owns PS2...thats great and fine, thats your personal opinion, but the numbers aren't on your side. :)

    The next gen war seems to be shaping up nicely, with so many flames going on alrdy. I'm glad though that Sony seems to be taking there time and doing things right, while MS seems to be rushing things some so they can be the first to release there next gen console.
     
  14. pags

    pags Member

    Posts:
    23
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    May 22, 2005
    They have movies, not devkits, sony's inability to answer the question "is it in game graphics" proves it. [/b][/quote]
    Sony's inability to answer the question??? Really, stop being so damn close-minded about this. Sony has stated that it is in game graphics twice on G4TV (if you weren't watching it during E3, you can find the clips on G4TV and IGN.com). If you proceed to ignore what I'm telling you, then that's your fault and not mine. It's funny how you are trying to prove that the PS3 is inferior in every way and that it is a hoax. The XBOX360 was more of a hoax at E3, seeing that their demos were being run by 2 macs through an empty 360 case. Try and make some sort of valid arguments...please. Don't let your fanboy-biased opinions prevent you from thinking clearly, because it only makes you look like an idiot (no offense).

    Also, icebergslim, keep in mind PS2 has been out much longer than the XBOX has been, as well as the gamecube. So those numbers really don't say much, except that PS2 has had more time to be purchased than the XBOX.
     
  15. PriceyG

    PriceyG Well-Known Member

    Age:
    35
    Posts:
    1,460
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2005
    Location:
    UK
    xbox is made by microsoft THE BIGEST COMPUTER BUSINESS IN THE WORLD !!!!!!!!!!!!

    it will kick sonys A$$ any day
     

Share This Page