reviewing a console before its out is just plain retarded. Sure, Killzone looks pretty, but is it a fun game?
http://www.gizmodo.com/gadgets/home-entert...c-g5-104295.php Teehee :lol: Also, reading about specs can't prove anything. It all depends on how it performs. A Radeon9200 256mb is NOT the same as a GeForce6800 256mb. It all comes down to raw power. As of now, 360 and PS3 are pretty much matched up (in general and in reference to specs). Also, that stupid IGN article about the xbox360: It looks like you didn't even READ it...check out the first paragraph: i.e. Microsoft Propaganda... Also, I'm not taking any sides here...
as i use to say, consoles wars suck lol ps3 is better in my opinion...thought it has a boomerang controllers
The PS3 is going to be used...inappropriately...its shiny, its long, and it vibrates Forget it being a bomerrang, when I look at it,I see a double ended dildo
every forum i've gone to so far that has had threads about the ps3, the members have all said it either looks like a dildo or a boomerang. hahaha. looks like sony needs a new idea =P
Looks like who cares what the controller looks like. How about what it feels like? Have you ever used it yet? Obviously not, so I don't see how you can try and use it as a reason to why the PS3 is bad...because the controller LOOKS bad? XBOXs original big ass controllers were huge pieces of ----, so they released smaller ones, and still XBOX ended up being a fine console, REGARDLESS of its awful controller. Sucker
Story about how pre-E3 conference for the ps3 couldn't have been done with the ps3 itself. http://www.computerandvideogames.com/news/...y.php?id=119444 That doesn't mean that the ps3 won't perform as well as it was shown. It may even turn out to be better. Who knows?
