Ya uhm, maybe your sigs arent artistic, some people put in hours of work into 1 single signature. so you kinda gotta think about what you say.
If someone is putting hours of work into one signature, they're obviously really bad at it. Some sigs are more artistic than others, but in no way would I categorize them as art. Most of the people who argue that sigs are art have absolutely no ability to produce good looking work above the size of 400 by 200 pixels, and are trying to justify the fact that their "1337 photohax skillzzz" are in fact limited to what they learned to copy off other peoples tutorials.
lol. Lots of people reject signatures as an artform, unless of course that particular sig/tag or whatever is a shrunken version of a much larger piece. Try posting a bunch of sigs even on a deviantart page.. they'll get more hate than if an anime drawing of two male furries kissing received a DD. No point in putting so much effort into a canvas smaller than the screen of your cell phone... might as well work on bigger projects.. But that's where the line between mediocrity and a decent piece of work becomes apparant.. A lot of people who make sigs are absolutely horrible at taking those skills and applying them to something larger and worthwhile.
signatures arent art you guys are fucking retarded and the kid who always has his text light blue is fucking retarded bye
...its actually possible for someone around here to have a different opinion, and not act like they've had a special ed van shoved up their ass when they disagree? Wow!
You may have been talking about a website that went down probably a year or two ago. It was called sigoftheweek.com