Definitely weird. Especially since baby's don't have the ability yet to communicate with others, let alone know how angels look like and positively identify them. And when us humans are old enough to actually understand the concept of angels etc., we have already long forgotten our memories as a baby. And contacting the dead? What is up with that Constantine bull----. But of course, everything that is written in the Bible is the truth. How can you doubt that uh?
Health class? what sort of soft ---- is that? I think you'll find most of your brain is put to use during any given day, actually in your case; maybe not.
You're both right, and wrong. And for the purposes of this argument, you're both wrong. While it's true that almost the entirety of the brain is used in some form (though not in a day) it does however not operate at nearly full capacity. IE: You use most of your brain, but not to it's potential. The common statistic of using only 10% of our brain is a myth though with some resemblance of truth, in that although we might use all of our brain to an extent, it operates at 10% of what it's actually capable of, if not significantly less.
Bible truth? Let's take a look! The Bible is unquestionably the world's all-time bestseller with an estimated 2 billion copies in print. The Bible was completed in its entirety nearly 2,000 years ago and stands today as the best-preserved literary work of all antiquity, with over 24,000 ancient New Testament manuscripts discovered so far (compare this with the second best-preserved literary work of all antiquity, Homer's Iliad, with only 643 preserved manuscripts discovered thus far). The printing press wasn't invented until the 1450's, but we have hand-written copies of the Old Testament dating back to the 200's BC. Remarkably, these ancient manuscripts are nearly identical to the Bible we read today. As far as the New Testament, the Bodmer Papyrus II contains most of the Gospel of John and dates from around 150-200 AD. The Chester Beatty Papyri contains major portions of the New Testament and dates back to about 200 AD. The Codex Vaticanus, the oldest complete New Testament manuscript we've discovered so far, dates from 325-350 AD. The apostle John, who lived with Jesus and learned from Jesus, penned five New Testament books and died in 100 AD. We have fragments of John's Gospel that date from 110-130 AD, within 30 years of his death. When compared to other ancient works such as Plato, Homer or Tacitus, that short time period between the original and the most recent copy is dramatic! Clement of Rome was martyred in 100 AD. In his writings, he quoted from Matthew, Mark, Luke, Acts, 1 Corinthians, 1 Peter, Hebrews, and Titus. Clement's quotes totally correspond with the Bible we read today. In fact, even if we lost all of the 5,300 early Greek manuscripts, all of the 10,000 Latin vulgates, and all of the 9,300 other ancient manuscripts, we would be able to reconstruct all but 11 verses of the New Testament from the writings of the early Church leaders who quoted from them extensively. We have over 36,000 preserved quotes from the New Testament. In a nutshell, the Bible stands today as the best-preserved literary work of all antiquity, and it's overall reliability is without question! Now about you're brain and using how much percentage of it, Sir John Eccles has stated his feelings on the infinite potential of the human brain, and he won the Noble prize. Such a statement that "We use all of our brain all of the time" or "It is a myth that we only use 10% of our brain" are both misleading and unhelpful uninspiring skeptical crumbs with barely a grain of truth- As well as not even being accurate statements regarding usage of the human brain. To say "We use all of our brain all of the time" says nothing about the potential of human intelligence, creativity, and problem solving. Such a skeptical rebuttal of the vast potential of the human think machine implies that we have reached our limits of brain potential- probably the most harmful dead end notion of all. We haven't even gotten close. Our frontal lobes have been culturally and socially lobotomized. At this stage of evolution, we are simply still Apes With Pencils. That's actually very good news. Why do some such "experts" delight it saying "It is a MYTH that we only use 10% of our brain." ? It's the old, "I know more than YOU Game. It's an ego thing. It's a reptile brain on-upmanship thing. It's the old "You are stupid and I am smart by comparison thing." Skeptics LOVE telling people they are wrong. It makes them feel superior. Just like all of you calling this man a liar, It is a sin of omission, as as often as not, such people making this contrary statement do not really let us know the whole story. "It is a myth that you only use 10% of your brain" is no more helpful and informative than saying, "The moon is not made of green cheese". It tells us very little, indeed. So, as it turns out, to say that "We only use 10% of our brain, only 10% of our brain potential"- this is actually an infinitely optimistic, as well as a considerably reasonable and thoughtful perspective of the possibilities that reside inside our craniums. It is a helpful generalization and observation by and for the lay person, and although not literally precise, it reflects upon the reality that owners of a human think box have an enormous mental potential from which to draw, from which we as individuals and as a human culture, often as not, ignore. Humans have an unlimited capacity to learn. Unlike computers, no human brain has ever said: "Hard drive full.
Best part is that I stopped reading at "Bible truth? Let's take a look!". Congratulations on spending the time on writing a wall of text which no one will read but you. You would be better off pasting the lorem ipsum text. Also, I consider the Harry Potter books to be closer to the truth than the bible.
You realize that not only Christianity is involved in the usage of the bible, and that *many* religions and cultures study the bible in addition to their primary religious script. Unlike most Christians, many other religions believe in understanding the teachings of all world religions, which is predominately why the bible sells so much more than any other religious text. This does not even begin to recognize that many families pass down their religious books through generations, kind of as an heirloom, and hence many of these families do not own multiple copies, where a vast portion of Christian / Catholic families own multiple copies (hell, I am not even religious and I own at least 5 full copies of the bible and more translations of the old testament). I hope you also know that the Bible does not own the manuscripts shared in its scriptures. Most of the other religions throughout the world have used the same writings. Matter of fact, if you weren't ignorant, and had researched most of the worlds religions, you would realize that almost all world religions follow the same basic concepts and stories and teachings with slight modifications (which mostly come down to translations). The difference is how religions practice, which is where the concept of judgmental attitudes and bias comes from. People don't like comprehending that someone may believe in something other than your own belief, people also never want to believe they could be wrong while someone else is right without factual evidence directly placed in front of their nose (and face it, there is no proof proving or disproving the existence of god - so don't try). Regarding your excerpt on how much of the brain is used, you are essentially just comparing a developing red apple a developed apple. All that the text did is specify the meaning behind the term which is subjected to opinion, and translation, not direct meaning on the basis of the original term. It's like correcting me if I were to say, 'hit the 'start' button to turn on the power' and you saying, 'hit the 'start' button to turn on the microwave to cook food'. It does nothing more than specify the subject at hand while attempting (and failing) to make yourself seem more intelligent.
I'm slightly confused. How on earth does the fact that...the bible...is old, make it a reliable piece of text? How on earth does the fact that the bible has been quoted that much make it a reliable piece of text? If it was written as a piece of fiction (or comprised of fictional material) in the times of its creation then it is no more fact today than it was within that time. Despite your religion, the bible is simply the best selling piece of fiction of all time, and all copies of the bible in libraries should be moved into the fiction section thusly.
