No you're just a ------in' tard at flaming. Our members are greater than because we're better than you. Just that. You think our sensible and knowledgeable, but sometimes opinionated posts are annoying when all you post is bull----. It's very hypocritical, and very embarrassing. I don't see how you're better than me in anyway, so what gives you the right to judge me. [/b][/quote] Felt the need to quote both of these. But we'll start with the first one. I'm not going to go on and on about how hypocritical it was of you, to call me hypocritical and insult my flaming when your post seems like it's put together by a 5 year old. I didn't judge you, what I said was essentially fact in that people such as you, are known for one glaring reason ; being ------ing annoying. I won't even go into how you've insulted my intelligence when you're struggling to type such complicated words as "your", and missing out "you". Seriously though, do you not see the blatant hypocrisy within your post? No? I'll point it out for you. (I'm just that nice.) You : Because we're better than you. You : So what gives' you the right to judge me? Let's look at that. Yeah, right, well done. And on to the next part. It's a shame you think my work's repetitive, considering I've recieved 3 Daily Deviations for it, which is more than the vast majority of people. Not going to say I'm good, because in the grand scheme of it, I'm not. However insulting my graphic skills when i'm far better than you hardly seems like a good way to win an argument now does it? Thanks for playing. [/b][/quote] really? You didn't judge him, you just stereotyped him..? Yea, makes good sense now..
Nooo, you should explain. I'm sure you would even if I gave an exact definition. Lets try it, "The term is often used with a negative connotation when referring to an oversimplified, exaggerated, or demeaning assumption that a particular individual possesses the characteristics associated with the class due to his or her membership in it." Hmmm....so, where was I wrong? Lol
Well, you were wrong in that what I said wasn't a stereotypical view in the slightest. It had nothing to do with his class, or, anything about him aside from his posts. Your own definition proved you wrong. Should I thank you for playing too?
At least half of this thread needs to be forcibly removed from the gene pool. See if you can guess which side I mean. Spoiler: Magic.
I have picked up women by being a competitive gamer. True story, and no, I don't mean fat ass women. For example, look at some of the top halo teams, many of the women on them look like they should belong to a Texas cheerleading squad. In the modern world mroe hookups occur from internet related or electronic related things - stuff like gaming intrigues a lot more people now than you would think. Actually, the gaming market is very good at making money through competition. If your good enough to compete quite a few of the halo / wow players I know don't have any other job and make a 40-50k/year salary just by traveling once or twice a month and competing.
No you're just a ------in' tard at flaming. Our members are greater than because we're better than you. Just that. You think our sensible and knowledgeable, but sometimes opinionated posts are annoying when all you post is bull----. It's very hypocritical, and very embarrassing. I don't see how you're better than me in anyway, so what gives you the right to judge me. [/b][/quote] Felt the need to quote both of these. But we'll start with the first one. I'm not going to go on and on about how hypocritical it was of you, to call me hypocritical and insult my flaming when your post seems like it's put together by a 5 year old. I didn't judge you, what I said was essentially fact in that people such as you, are known for one glaring reason ; being ------ing annoying. I won't even go into how you've insulted my intelligence when you're struggling to type such complicated words as "your", and missing out "you". Seriously though, do you not see the blatant hypocrisy within your post? No? I'll point it out for you. (I'm just that nice.) You : Because we're better than you. You : So what gives' you the right to judge me? Let's look at that. Yeah, right, well done. And on to the next part. It's a shame you think my work's repetitive, considering I've recieved 3 Daily Deviations for it, which is more than the vast majority of people. Not going to say I'm good, because in the grand scheme of it, I'm not. However insulting my graphic skills when i'm far better than you hardly seems like a good way to win an argument now does it? Thanks for playing. [/b][/quote] Really broken, you're going to make me quote you, eh? Alright, I'll break this down for you, alright? Essentially, implying that it is NOT a fact. It's close, but no cigar, get it? "People like you." Is associating him with a certain type of people, get it, stereotype? Just let it go, broken, you're very blatantly wrong.
No you're just a ------in' tard at flaming. Our members are greater than because we're better than you. Just that. You think our sensible and knowledgeable, but sometimes opinionated posts are annoying when all you post is bull----. It's very hypocritical, and very embarrassing. I don't see how you're better than me in anyway, so what gives you the right to judge me. [/b][/quote] Felt the need to quote both of these. But we'll start with the first one. I'm not going to go on and on about how hypocritical it was of you, to call me hypocritical and insult my flaming when your post seems like it's put together by a 5 year old. I didn't judge you, what I said was essentially fact in that people such as you, are known for one glaring reason ; being ------ing annoying. I won't even go into how you've insulted my intelligence when you're struggling to type such complicated words as "your", and missing out "you". Seriously though, do you not see the blatant hypocrisy within your post? No? I'll point it out for you. (I'm just that nice.) You : Because we're better than you. You : So what gives' you the right to judge me? Let's look at that. Yeah, right, well done. And on to the next part. It's a shame you think my work's repetitive, considering I've recieved 3 Daily Deviations for it, which is more than the vast majority of people. Not going to say I'm good, because in the grand scheme of it, I'm not. However insulting my graphic skills when i'm far better than you hardly seems like a good way to win an argument now does it? Thanks for playing. [/b][/quote] "You : Because we're better than you. You : So what gives' you the right to judge me?" When I said we're better than everyone else, I wasn't serious. I can't say I'm better at anything tbh. Maybe some sports, maybe poetry, etc, but it's all just opinionated and can't be proven, which is why I don't really use it against anyone. I was joking, obviously. I'm not full of idiocy like you are. I mean, we MAY be better than you at the fact that you only continue to embarrass yourself. You are so much better than me at graphic design, and I do envy SOME of your work. But your work is repetitive whether you argue with me or not. I see a lot of the same shiit in a LOT of your LPs. Congrats. 3 daily deviations on dA. Uhmmm, I'm offended? I didn't insult your graphic skills. Calling your work repetitive is more common criticism. If I said your work is "------ing garbage," then your statement is true. You don't have any authority over me because you have 3 daily deviations. That was my point, ffs. and Dem you're right. My friend Gowan played for an MLG team in Illionois, I don't know which team or whatever, but he's got pics of his team playing/before they played. It is a nice asset sometimes. I know there are plenty of beautiful women who enjoy gaming their selves, and would be attracted to somebody with a lot of skill. It still isn't anything to brag about though. A girl may love the fact that you are a gamer. 30% of the time, maybe even 50% of the time. But it's totally not something most people would fancy as an attractive lifestyle. If you are a latin dancer as a male, or a writer, a poet, whatever. I know what you mean, and you're right, my point still stands. Being better than me at graphics isn't hurting me at all, and "may" be just a pointless direction of life, socially. Career wise, CONGRATS! 60-100 grand a year is a lot, I envy your career path if it's graphics design. Don't insult me or command me because you have 3 daily deviations at DA though.
No, people like you is not associating him with a particular, anything. I was merely stating that he belongs to a group of people who decide to be annoying and piss off the rest off the forum for some unknown reason. I know you're struggling to comprehend this, but that's not a stereotype. I don't have pre-judged values about him, aside from seeing his posts, I didn't change the way I acted to him due to his class/race and so forth, merely his attitude. I think you'll find that's the opposite of stereotyping. --- "I was joking" is a pathetic defense, so I'll dismiss that one. Your oh so subtle joke. (And again both of you seem to struggle with the concept that jokes are meant to be funny). Repetetive is an insult, it's not constructive in the slightest, if it was constructive it'd be "And this is how to change it", or however you want to say it. And I'll disagree that my work is repetitive, but, that's pure opinion so again completely dismissable. I never claimed to have any authority over you, you started this. What I said initially wasn't even particularly directed at you yet you felt a desire to start a little e-flame war. I don't remember commanding you, I remember insulting you (and that having ------ all to do with graphics, in the slightest, YOU brought graphics up).; and only because you initiated it, at least on this level. If you're going to bring up my graphics, I'm going to defend myself, so don't get all whiny when I do.
Hmmm, broken, you arrogant tool. The fact that you said, "People like you." makes it the definition of a stereotype. Since when do you have to treat someone differently? You just have to think something. Which you obviously did. You are getting hung up on this class, eh? Broken...lol, it's so unbelievably obvious here. The little phrase, "People like you." makes it a stereotype. Yuo don't have to be racist, to be a stereotype. You did have a prejudged sense of who he was, obviously, "PEOPLE LIKE YOU."
People like you does not make it a ------ing stereotype. Not only did I never say "People like you", I said "People such as you" which isn't the same. I decided, based on his posts, to respond in a certain way. It's not a comment on him anyway, it's a comment on the social perception of him ; IE annoying. I know this is tough, but it's not a stereotype. People such as you does not make it a stereotype. You can't make such a broad assumption on such an insignificant phrase. Well clearly you can, but you're wrong.
...Well glad to know my random flame was not worth my time if that is what you came up with.. c'mon a bit of effort here would be nice! Nope i just picked someone i knew would overreact, and therefore you have given me my snack for today, goodnight.
...Well glad to know my random flame was not worth my time if that is what you came up with.. c'mon a bit of effort here would be nice! Nope i just picked someone i knew would overreact, and therefore you have given me my snack for today, goodnight.
jesus christ, 4 words THIS IS THE INTERNET what does it matter that people you'll never meet think of you? so quit ya jibba jabba and get along <object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/aIbHP8zix3Y"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/aIbHP8zix3Y" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object>
