Latest

Discussion in 'Signatures' started by jerzy, Jan 24, 2009.

  1. jerzy

    jerzy Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    240
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2006
    first in months am quite happy with it

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
  2. Quyxz

    Quyxz Senior Member

    Age:
    33
    Posts:
    1,579
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2005
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    Hmm, my first impression is, 'that's pretty plain.'
    But after looking for a little bit longer I think that isn't a negative thing. It gives the sig a pretty good focal on the left.
    But I think the first and last version of the sig don't have enough color. Since the sig is pretty plain, the color must give it something more. If you understand what I mean..
    So 2nd version is the best because it has the most color.
    NJ :)
     
  3. DRM

    DRM Senior Member

    Age:
    34
    Posts:
    1,083
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2008
    Location:
    Belfast
    Was wondering what to say about it then read Quyxz's comment and he really did hit the nail on the head with it. My views exactly
     
  4. iK3VRR

    iK3VRR Well-Known Member

    Age:
    33
    Posts:
    1,070
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2008
    Location:
    iLLaDeLPHiA, PA
    Black/white GMV

    It looks overall better IMO
     
  5. jerzy

    jerzy Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    240
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2006
    Thanks for feedback guys :)
     

Share This Page