Well not really Broken, why do you say that? Okay, I know they have added the action and jumping around... But don't you agree that they are saying Daniel Craig is the toughest bond ever?
What aspect of the film made it a Bond film? Aside from the main character being called James Bond. There was a lack of flash cars (Except the very start). There was no gadgets No Q No Suave-ness really. It was a good film, and he's a tough bond. However the film lost everything that made it bond in the first place, it's essentially just another action film. They NEED to start basing them of the Fleming books again.
Are you serious? It was a terrible Bond movie. My thoughts? : ****Spoiler**** (Maybe, maybe not) It was an action movie with the Bond title, not even that much of an action movie, way too many scenes trying to explain the "Hey, lets stop this guy from causing a drought in a 3rd world country..." Only thing I did like was the introduction to Felix and Bonds taste for Women instead of a Woman. Although the Bond girl in this one was acting as if she was in the Darjeeling Unlimited (or whatever it was called), she was soo drab. Ugh, huge let down, i wish i saved my money so i could watch Transporter 3 when it comes out instead. Plus, no Q, even though Clease will be Q in the next one, so hopefully gadgets will be back. And where in the bleeping hell was "Bond, James Bond" ?
What you people are failing to realize is that this movie was a continuation on the last film, so there really was no need for him to introduce himself to anyone, or get new gadgets from Q. And I have no idea how you are saying it wasn't an action movie, the critics said it had "to much action" and it was the most action packed bond film yet. And without explaining all that 3rd world stuff we wouldn't understand this new organization that bond is going after.
Just because it's a sequel doesn't mean there are no new characters introduced, or no new problems faced. Srsly. Don't be stupid.
I though it was a good action movie but that's it. The story was confusing and rather plain :\ It's worth watching? Yup. It's a good 007 Movie? Nope.
Well not really Broken, why do you say that? Okay, I know they have added the action and jumping around... But don't you agree that they are saying Daniel Craig is the toughest bond ever? [/b][/quote] What aspect of the film made it a Bond film? Aside from the main character being called James Bond. There was a lack of flash cars (Except the very start). There was no gadgets No Q No Suave-ness really. It was a good film, and he's a tough bond. However the film lost everything that made it bond in the first place, it's essentially just another action film. They NEED to start basing them of the Fleming books again. [/b][/quote] I couldn't agree more, perfectly put.
