tbh We could just put a towel on his head and have him detained in Guantanamo. No wait, Obama is going to close that in a few months. Just have him face the firing squad and we'll be good to go.
claiming obama is the Antichrist is nonsense the Antichrist is supposed to be someone that no one will know is the Antichrist and half of America thinks he is
Do you know what Gitmo is? First of all detainees aren't entitled to any protection from the Geneva Conventions, which is unconstitutional. Secondly many detainees have been tortured there. Basically the camp is unconstitutional. So why is closing down Gitmo bad? Also water boarding if that is what you are refering to is against the Convention Against Torture. Even though people may disagree all you have to do is read Part 1, Article 1: For the purposes of this Convention, torture means any act by which severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, is intentionally inflicted on a person for such purposes as obtaining from him or a third person information or a confession, punishing him for an act he or a third person has committed or is suspected of having committed, or intimidating or coercing him or a third person, or for any reason based on discrimination of any kind, when such pain or suffering is inflicted by or at the instigation of or with the consent or acquiescence of a public official or other person acting in an official capacity. It does not include pain or suffering arising only from, inherent in or incidental to lawful sanctions.
^Joke failure. I don't think MP said anywhere he was against the closing of Guantanamo.. And for some weird reason I doubt he was actually considering using water boarding on GP.
I am writing to express my dismay and concern over Pres. Barack Obama's prudish, immature fulminations. If you disagree with my claim that Obama's inerudite whinges exhibit the patina of communism, then read no further. I mean, really. Obama is like a giant octopus sprawling its slimy length over city, state, and nation. Like the octopus of real life, he operates under cover of self-created screen. Obama seizes in his long and powerful tentacles our executive officers, our legislative bodies, our schools, our courts, our newspapers, and every agency created for the public protection. He is doing everything in his power to make me fall into the traps set for me by his legates. The only reason I haven't yet is that I believe in the four P's: patience, prayer, positive thinking, and perseverance. Just because Obama and his coadjutors don't like being labelled as "satanic, brazen scaramouches" or "apolaustic pipsqueaks" doesn't mean the shoe doesn't fit. Although the moral absolutist position is well represented by social and political activists and unequivocally influences legislators and policy makers, he insists that Trotskyism brings one closer to nirvana. Sorry, Obama, but, with apologies to Gershwin, "it ain't necessarily so." Is that such a difficult concept? If I recall correctly, the really interesting thing about all this is not that he is determined to put as little thought as possible into solving the undeniable problems that our society is still facing with regard to escapism. The interesting thing is that from secret-handshake societies meeting at "the usual place" to back-door admissions committees, his operatives have always found a way to traffic in our blood, birthright, and security. It's really amazing, isn't it? We can put people on the Moon and send robot explorers to Mars, but one of Obama's cult followers once said, "All it takes to solve our social woes are shotgun marriages, heavy-handed divorce laws, and a return to some mythical 1950s Shangri-la." Now that's pretty funny, of course, but I didn't include that quote just to make you laugh. I included it to convince you that Obama plans to publish blatantly abusive rhetoric as "education" for children to learn in school. The result will be an amalgam of distasteful stoicism and perverted incendiarism, if such a monster can be imagined. Regardless of whether we consider him a lunatic, an evil aggressor, or whatever, from the perspective of those inside Obama's lynch mob, five-crystal orgone generators can eliminate mind-control energies that are being radiated from secret, underground, government facilities. The reality, however, is that one of the goals of fogyism is to render meaningless the words "best" and "worst". Obama admires that philosophy because, by annihilating human perceptions of quality, Obama's own mediocrity can flourish. Listen up: I have to laugh when Obama says that you and I are inferior to pharisaical, fatuitous savages. Where in the world did he get that idea? Not only does that idea contain absolutely no substance whatsoever but when he says that the average working-class person can't see through his chicanery, in his mind, that's supposed to end the argument. It's like he believes he has said something very profound. His reasoning is circular and therefore invalid. In other words, he always begins an argument with his conclusion (e.g., that quislingism can quell the hatred and disorder in our society) and therefore -- not surprisingly -- he always arrives at that very conclusion. I could tell Obama that the only appropriate attitudes in a society overrun by pretentious upstarts are fear and distrust, although he obviously doesn't care. I could tell him that he is hell-bent on suppressing our freedom, but he wouldn't believe me. He probably also doesn't care that he eats the substance out of any organization he attacks, destroys its moral virility, throws down its reverence, saps its respect for authority, and casts a shadow on every one of its basic principles. So let me appeal to whatever small semblance of reason Obama may be capable of when I tell him that my goal is to introduce an important but underrepresented angle on his psychotic codices. I might not be successful at achieving that goal but I certainly do have to try. And what about his bootlickers? They, like Obama, are negligent hermits. The time is always right to do what is right. That's why we must sincerely end Obama's control over the minds and souls of countless people. The first step in that process is to realize that his publications are a gangrenous putrefaction that serves only to present a false image to the world by hiding unpleasant but vitally important realities about Obama's expedients. I've said that before and I've said it often, but perhaps I haven't been concrete enough or specific enough, so now I'll try to remedy those shortcomings. I'll try to be a lot more specific and concrete when I explain that Obama's criticisms of my letters have never successfully disproved a single fact I ever presented. Instead, his criticisms are based solely on his emotions and gut reactions. Well, I refuse to get caught up in Obama's "I think … I believe … I feel" game. Here, too, we can see how Obama has been trying for quite some time to convince us that anyone who dares to protect our peace, privacy, and safety can expect to suffer hair loss and tooth decay as a result. I suggest he take this rotting ordure and dump it where he and his fellow conceited survivalists congregate. At least then we could strike at the heart of his efforts to destabilize society without having to worry that he will spit in the face of propriety. Given a choice of having him paint people of different races and cultures as obscene alien forces undermining the coherent national will or having my bicuspids extracted sans Novocaine, I would embrace the pliers, purchase some Polident Partials, and call it a day. If Obama believes that he is a martyr for freedom and a victim of nepotism, then it's obvious why he thinks that we can all live together happily without laws, like the members of some 1960s-style dope-smoking commune. His opinions always follow the same pattern. He puts the desired twist on the actual facts, ignores inconvenient facts, and invents as many new "facts" as necessary to convince us that we have too much freedom. One wonders how Obama can complain about reprehensible, pushy vagrants of one sort or another given that his own expositions also aim to turn our country into a depraved, pusillanimous cesspool overrun with scum, disease, and crime. His nasty hariolations leave the current power structure untouched while simultaneously killing countless children through starvation and disease. Are these children Obama's enemies? As you no doubt realize, that's a particularly timely question. In fact, just half an hour ago I heard someone express the opinion that over time, Obama's bruta fulmina have progressed from being merely imprudent to being superimprudent, hyperimprudent, and recently ultraimprudent. In fact, I'd say that now they're even megaimprudent. Let's face it: Obama accuses me of being perfidious whenever I state that his allegations are a rummy orgy of barbarism. All right, I'll admit that I have a sharp tongue and sometimes write with a bit of a poison pen but the fact remains that Obama displays the paranoid malice that is the hallmark of true imperialism. Let me rephrase that: Obama says that every featherless biped, regardless of intelligence, personal achievement, moral character, sense of responsibility, or sanity, should be given the power to grasp at straws, trying to find increasingly anal-retentive ways to carve out space in the mainstream for cranky politics. That is the most despicable lie I have ever heard in my entire life. Now there will, no doubt, be lamebrained pothouse drunks out there who will ask, "So what if Obama's allies shackle us with the chains of sexism? That won't affect me." Such crippled thinking is the best example there is as to why Obama is completely witless, as he has proved to my complete satisfaction. I'm no psychiatrist. Still, from the little I know about psychiatry I can say that Obama seems to exhibit many of the symptoms of Asperger's syndrome. I don't say that to judge but merely to put Obama's crass machinations into perspective. Currently, his -------and-bull stories merely fortify a social correctness that restricts experience and defines success with narrow boundaries. As you will see before long, this is only the tip of a gigantic iceberg. Even though supposedly distancing himself from despicable loonies, he has really not changed his spots at all. It would be more productive for Obama to take a more diplomatic and conciliatory approach. Think I'm exaggerating? Just ask any of the most valuable members of our community and they'll all tell you how Obama likes saying that all it takes to start a rabbit farm is a magician's magic hat. Okay, that's a parody -- but not a very gross one. In point of fact, I find that I am embarrassed. Embarrassed that some people just don't realize that my job now and for the immediate future -- our job -- is to comment on Obama's recommendations. The facts are indisputable, the arguments are impeccable, and the consequences are undeniable. So why does Obama maintain that he commands an army of robots that live in the hollow center of the earth and produce earthquakes whenever they feel like shaking things up a bit on the surface? My answer is, as always, a model of clarity and the soul of wit: I don't know. However, I do know that you don't have to say anything specifically about him for him to start attacking you. All you have to do is dare to imply that we should fight tooth and nail against him. Call me dictatorial if you'd like; I will still do everything in my power to criticize the obvious incongruities presented by Obama and his attendants. Then, I will announce to the world that we must appeal not to the contented and satisfied, but embrace those tormented by suffering, those without peace, the unhappy and the discontented. This call to action begins with you. You must be the first to treat the disease, not the symptoms. You must be the one to deal stiffly with uninformed urban guerrillas who bamboozle people into believing that those who disagree with Obama should be cast into the outer darkness, should be shunned, should starve. And you must inform your fellow man that I fully intend to cast a ray of light on Obama's obstreperous vaporings. That's the path that I have chosen. It's decidedly not an easy path but then again, it would be charitable of me not to mention that one difference between Obama's adulators and other dark forces of anarchy and hatred is that the former intend to control, manipulate, and harm other people. Fortunately, I am not beset by a spirit of false charity so I will instead maintain that he attributes the most distorted, bizarre, and ludicrous "meanings" to ordinary personality characteristics. For example, if you're shy, Obama calls you "fearful and withdrawn". If, instead, you're the outgoing and active type, he says you're "acting out due to trauma". Why does Obama say such things? All I can do now is give you a bare-bones answer and then let you dig into it yourself. To understand the basic answer you need to realize that the justification Obama gave for turning the trickle of antiheroism into a tidal wave was one of the most fatuous justifications I've ever heard. It was so fatuous, in fact, that I will not repeat it here. Even without hearing the details you can still see my point quite clearly: Obama's insinuations can be subtle. They can be so subtle that many people never realize they're being influenced by them. That's why we must proactively notify humanity that I want to unify our community. Obama, in contrast, wants to drive divisive ideological wedges through it. And that, in my view, is our real problem.
No. This argument is filled with about 56 types of logical fallacy. If it's meant to be a joke, great. If not...
Sorry, but much of that didn't make sense. Plus all of that was you rambling on, with misleading pretence. It has nothing to do with you being against obama or hitler, most of it was just a ramble. Kinda reminds me of these people that have nothing to do besides sitting in their house all day,trying to figure a way to accuse someone they dislike of something.
I hope you know from the first paragraph alone I laughed pretty damn hard. A thesaurus and dictionary are two really great books, amirite?
STOP QUOTING THE HUGE DAMN POST. Now that's covered. Copy and pasting someone's own inane ramblings will not bode well sir, not bode well at all.
Let's talk again about an all-too-familiar subject: Darkmage and his acrimonious opuscula. I would like to start by discussing Darkmage's analects, mainly because they scare me. The thing I'm the most frightened about is that if the human race is to survive on this planet, we will have to improve the lot of humankind. Please forgive the following sermon, but it can't be avoided in this discussion: His hagiographic adoration of Pyrrhonism is honestly sickening. But let's not lose sight of the larger, more important issue here: his eccentric, indecent threats. There are some predaceous marauders who are irresponsible. There are also some who are deplorable. Which category does Darkmage fall into? If the question overwhelms you, I suggest you check "both". Some loquacious monomaniacs are hopelessly unrestrained and hence, by extension, if a modern Dante were to update the Divine Comedy, he would have to create a special circle in Hell for pushy knuckle-draggers who excoriate attempts to bring questions of radicalism into the (essentially apolitical) realm of pedagogy in language and writing. It is no more complicated than that. If the only way to get us out of the hammerlock that Darkmage is holding us in is for me to play right into the hands of wily maniacs, then so be it. It would unequivocally be worth it because when one looks at the increasing influence of antidisestablishmentarianism in our culture one sees that Darkmage's signature is on everything. So how come his fingerprints are nowhere to be found? Well, we all know the answer to that question, don't we? But in case you don't, then you should note that even when the facts don't fit, Darkmage sometimes tries to use them anyway. He still maintains, for instance, that his blessing is the equivalent of a papal imprimatur. We have a right, an indisputable, inalienable, indefeasible, divine right to study the problem and recommend corrective action. In just a moment I'll discuss some important recent developments based on this fundamental truth. First, however, I want to add a bit to what I wrote previously. Darkmage has a knack for convincing temperamental champions of deceit, lies, theft, plunder, and rapine that he is a tireless protector of civil rights and civil liberties for all people. That's called marketing. The underlying trick is to use sesquipedalian terms like "photochronographical" and "microcrystallography" to keep his sales pitch from sounding militant. That's why you really have to look hard to see that Darkmage is a loose cannon. That concept can be extended, mutatis mutandis, to the way that he wants to produce an army of mindless insects who will obey his every command. To produce such an army, Darkmage plans to destroy people's minds using either drugs or an advanced form of lobotomy. Whichever approach he takes, there are many roads leading to the defeat of his plans to make individuals indifferent to the survival of their families. I doubtlessly contend that all of these roads must eventually pass through the same set of gates: the ability to tell Darkmage what we all think of him -- and boy, do I have some choice words I'd like to use. Be that as it may, Darkmage is deeply involved emotionally in his attack on truth and reality. You may have detected a hint of sarcasm in the way I phrased that last statement but I assure you that I am not exaggerating the situation. He is stepping over the line when he attempts to create catchy, new terms for boring, old issues -- way over the line. I have no problem with the manifestly obvious statement that we are starting to witness the callous effects of Darkmage's expostulations. I have no problem with the idea that the reasons that Darkmage gives for his criticisms clearly do not correspond with his real motives. And I have no problem with the special privileges occasionally granted to the most brutish quacks I've ever seen. What I do have a problem with are Darkmage's dysfunctional flimflams. Let me close where I began: Darkmage excels in fickleness, inconstancy, absence of thought and logic, and incapacity to reason. This is complete bull http://www.pakin.org/complaint/ go nuts
