A B S T R A C T

Discussion in 'Signatures' started by nanSTA, Jun 20, 2008.

  1. nanSTA

    nanSTA Senior Member

    Posts:
    4,295
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2006
    Location:
    Chicago, IL
    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    CnC
     
  2. Savageplayer

    Savageplayer Well-Known Member

    Age:
    32
    Posts:
    1,451
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2007
    Location:
    indiana
    v2 ftw
    better colors

    very nice
    nice style and depth and such
    gah i can't find anything wrong with it o.o
     
  3. Sweden

    Sweden Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    96
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2008
    v2>v1 except maybe tone that background blur down a notch. But other than that, nice work.
     
  4. -Sя.WolfganG

    -Sя.WolfganG Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    1,094
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2008
    Location:
    Malaysia
    lol yeah i agree with chipe there..
    i really cant see any flaws onn v2
     
  5. AG Cliche

    AG Cliche Well-Known Member

    Age:
    40
    Posts:
    3,317
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2006
    Location:
    Dallas, Texas
    Looks good bro. Only thing I see adding is maybe some lighting, but other than that it looks good.

    v2 ftw.
     
  6. gforce2k8

    gforce2k8 Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    57
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2008
    Its extremly good, then only thing I can say is maybe there is too much of a blur in the background. v2 is better.
     
  7. nanSTA

    nanSTA Senior Member

    Posts:
    4,295
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2006
    Location:
    Chicago, IL
    I agree completely :P BG Overblurred. The reason i did that so the focal was more standing out.
     

Share This Page