Rate The Sig Above You ..

Discussion in 'Graphics discussion' started by TheGrudge214, Jan 5, 2002.

  1. dinges

    dinges Senior Member

    Posts:
    5,883
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2005
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    7,5/10

    both of them are nice
     
  2. SoFly

    SoFly Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    245
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2005
    I really like the first one, 8.5/10, just needs to be brighter I think. Second one the tech just isn't working for me, 7/10.
     
  3. dinges

    dinges Senior Member

    Posts:
    5,883
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2005
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    nice brushwork and coloring, really like it 8.5/10
     
  4. StWhatsername

    StWhatsername Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    51
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2005
    ^really nice! Prefer the first one though, 9. Love the font and the brushing behind it. 8 for the second one, I think the border goes well with the concept of the sig.
     
  5. Audacious

    Audacious Senior Member

    Age:
    41
    Posts:
    1,111
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2004
    Location:
    Scotland
    I don't think the colours match the theme of the sig, plus I think you should stick to 1 render per sig, nice brushing it'll look better with another render

    6/10
     
  6. Enkido

    Enkido Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    71
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2005
    6/10

    I don't really like the background or the 2 black lines on the buttom/top. The render looks good but the whole thing is too dark and the text is hard to find/read.
     
  7. DJM

    DJM Well-Known Member

    Age:
    34
    Posts:
    476
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2005
    Location:
    Shropshire - England
    7/10 Render is blended well, like the text but not sure about the choice of colour.
     
  8. DarkDrakeX

    DarkDrakeX Senior Member

    Posts:
    1,353
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2005
    Location:
    Georgia
    6/10 isnt really a sig and looks too echy fer my taste :P
     
  9. aVeD

    aVeD Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    178
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2005
    oops...fixing...

    -aved
     
  10. DJM

    DJM Well-Known Member

    Age:
    34
    Posts:
    476
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2005
    Location:
    Shropshire - England
    I like it because of it's simplicity and origionality, which is why I use it :unsure:
     
  11. aVeD

    aVeD Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    178
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2005
    ^unique...new feel,
    9/10

    -aved
     
  12. Pig

    Pig Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    1,400
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2005
    uhhh 6.5/10 sorry bro :|
     
  13. dotsnake

    dotsnake Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    1,641
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2004
    Location:
    nowhere
    come on.. stop this thread!
    7/10
     
  14. Luv_Fan

    Luv_Fan Active Member

    Age:
    42
    Posts:
    32
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2005
    Location:
    Texas
    Those eyes are hypnotic. 9.1/10
     
  15. Enkido

    Enkido Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    71
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2005
    9/10

    I really like that sig! It has that... "feel". It's just so great to look at.

    However, the color needs a little work. It's a little monotone.

    Alright I got a new siggy. I know the green might be a little saturated...
     

Share This Page