Photography Battle

Discussion in 'GR Classic Archive' started by Fallen, Feb 28, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Fallen

    Fallen Senior Member

    Age:
    35
    Posts:
    863
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    May 4, 2007
    Location:
    Canada
    No wager, first to 7 or a 5-0 KO.

    Mortified Penquin:
    [​IMG]

    Fallen-Fire:
    [​IMG]


    I have better photos, but he did a cityscape, otherwise its like compairing apples to oranges.

    Gl. :)
     
  2. V

    V Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    2,089
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2007
    FF all the way, MP's looks now wual and nothing special, tbh looks like you just walked outside and took a picture. bad lens flare and bade camera.

    0-1
     
  3. Arkasuss

    Arkasuss Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    1,317
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2007
    Location:
    Florida
    (except nicer)

    0-2
     
  4. Mortified Penguin

    Mortified Penguin Senior Member

    Age:
    38
    Posts:
    4,561
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2006
    Lol. I did walk out and take a picture. It had some nice effects going on that day so I was taking sky pictures but they aren't landscapes and this was the only one I had. The camera is only 4 mp but is one of the nicest 4 mp cameras out there.
     
  5. Genes.Buffet

    Genes.Buffet Well-Known Member

    Age:
    35
    Posts:
    2,168
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2006
    Location:
    SINGAPORE
    Fallen-fire GMV.

    Much more interesting composition than MP's.

    0-3
     
  6. Pulse.

    Pulse. Well-Known Member

    Age:
    41
    Posts:
    5,359
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2005
    Location:
    Reading, UK
    ff gmv, better pic and appeal to me

    0-4
     
  7. xlink

    xlink GR's Tech Enthusiast

    Posts:
    8,054
    Likes Received:
    3
    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2004
    there's a lot more to a camera than the maximum resolution it can take a picture at. MP is comparable to film quality in a traditional camera. back in the late ninties, the resolution a camera ran at was a considerable factor. Today it's no longer the case. ESPECIALLY for the web. 2000*2000 is a large resolution for all purposes... that's 4 megapixels there and such a resolution is good for the vast majority of things. Lens quality, shutter speed and a variety of other things matter as well.




    FF GMV it's a fair deal cleaner.
    0-5
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page