You do know that a vote for Nader is a vote for Hillary, should she come to be nominated. Really, voters are up the creek if Hillary gets nominated. There's no real Republican that has a chance, third party is a no-go (a third party hasn't had a real chance since 1912), and the only palatable candidate on the Democrats probably won't get the nomination, considering the influence the Clintons have over the party. As for Clinton's spending: she's planning on spending money we don't even have on things we don't even need. Thirty billion dollars poured into some sort of social welfare program that isn't even the government's job to be providing is pocket change to her. It's all about new programs with the Democrats, even though we've got plenty of them already. It's rediculous that she (and anybody else that gets elected, to be fair) would be proposing hundreds of billions more in spending when we're already trillions into debt.
