Candy Canes And

Discussion in 'Signatures' started by solarum123, Dec 26, 2007.

  1. solarum123

    solarum123 Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    350
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2006
    [​IMG]

    for the lulz! :lol:
     
  2. iconicd

    iconicd Member

    Posts:
    10
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2007
    I know I am a noob here, but that just looks like a photo. :s
     
  3. Hoplite_A2

    Hoplite_A2 Well-Known Member

    Age:
    37
    Posts:
    2,395
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2007
    Location:
    Clearwater, FL
    I'm pretty sure it's somewhat of
    a gag. lol

    The colors have been messed with though. ^_^

    CANDY CANES FTW!!!
     
  4. solarum123

    solarum123 Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    350
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2006
    Actually no. If you looked at the original image you would see that the flowers and mountains, the background, is at the lower part of the photo. I also enhanced the colors. You don't need to spam c4d and effects to make a tag.

    I learned a lot from this tag from experimenting
    -how some of the gradient maps react to adjustment layers.
    -simplecity
    -its for the lulz! XD
    -and a bit on composition

    And in all actuality, this is the kind of things you should be practicing if you want to get in the designing business.
     
  5. Hoplite_A2

    Hoplite_A2 Well-Known Member

    Age:
    37
    Posts:
    2,395
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2007
    Location:
    Clearwater, FL
    Well,
    you've got a point there mate. ;)
    But who says designing needs to stay
    boring like it already is? :P

    I feel you though bro. I wasn't diggin' on ya.

    If it looks good. It doesn't really matter
    how much work it took. ^_^

    Still,
    you don't have to spam c4ds and effects,
    you can just use 'em. ;) :P

    :D
     
  6. solarum123

    solarum123 Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    350
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2006
    actually i was talking more to the 1st poster since i got delayed on posting my comment. XD
     
  7. solarum123

    solarum123 Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    350
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2006
    bumporz
     
  8. solarum123

    solarum123 Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    350
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2006
    bumpity!
     
  9. QcSpeedy

    QcSpeedy Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    379
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2007
    Hum... I don't like the render but it's my opinion and there is a critical missing of effects on it. I would not call this a signature.
     
  10. Whitesock

    Whitesock Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    140
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2007
    Well it is a signature and a nice photo, but it doesn't have bright sparkily effects! :(
     
  11. solarum123

    solarum123 Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    350
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2006
    ah yes. the bright sparkly effects... is that how you would call a signature? a couple or collection of sparkly effects?
     
  12. Whitesock

    Whitesock Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    140
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2007
    Well you see, that was a joke. Also, I like bright sparkly effects! :rofl:
     
  13. solarum123

    solarum123 Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    350
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2006
    anymore?
     

Share This Page